142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27491025)
1. 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical study comparing everolimus plus reduced-dose cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose cyclosporine in de novo kidney transplantation: Retrospective single center assessment.
Hiramitsu T; Okada M; Futamura K; Yamamoto T; Tsujita M; Goto N; Narumi S; Watarai Y; Takeda A; Iwasaki K; Uchida K; Kobayashi T
Int Immunopharmacol; 2016 Oct; 39():192-198. PubMed ID: 27491025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three-yr results of a single-center prospective clinical trial.
Favi E; Spagnoletti G; Salerno MP; Pedroso JA; Romagnoli J; Citterio F
Clin Transplant; 2013; 27(4):E359-67. PubMed ID: 23710603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.
Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF;
Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.
Tedesco-Silva H; Felipe C; Ferreira A; Cristelli M; Oliveira N; Sandes-Freitas T; Aguiar W; Campos E; Gerbase-DeLima M; Franco M; Medina-Pestana J
Am J Transplant; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2655-64. PubMed ID: 25988935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study.
Lorber MI; Mulgaonkar S; Butt KM; Elkhammas E; Mendez R; Rajagopalan PR; Kahan B; Sollinger H; Li Y; Cretin N; Tedesco H;
Transplantation; 2005 Jul; 80(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16041270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine versus full-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate in de novo renal transplant patients: a 2-year single-center experience.
Santos SM; Carlos CM; Cabanayan-Casasola CB; Danguilan RA
Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 22310603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.
Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of the early introduction of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine a in de novo kidney recipients.
Oh CK; Huh KH; Ha J; Kim YH; Kim YL; Kim YS
Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):180-6. PubMed ID: 24983307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized trial of everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor minimization over 24 months in renal transplantation.
Cibrik D; Silva HT; Vathsala A; Lackova E; Cornu-Artis C; Walker RG; Wang Z; Zibari GB; Shihab F; Kim YS
Transplantation; 2013 Apr; 95(7):933-42. PubMed ID: 23422495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus following living-donor kidney transplantation: outcomes at 5 years posttransplant in the randomized ZEUS trial.
Sommerer C; Budde K; Zeier M; Wüthrich RP; Reinke P; Eisenberger U; Mühlfeld A; Arns W; Stahl R; Heller K; Wolters HH; Suwelack B; Klehr HU; Hauser IA; Stangl M; Nadalin S; Dürr M; Porstner M; May C; Wimmer P; Witzke O; Lehner F
Clin Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26932178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and Safety of an Everolimus- vs. a Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Regimen in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.
Brunkhorst LC; Fichtner A; Höcker B; Burmeister G; Ahlenstiel-Grunow T; Krupka K; Bald M; Zapf A; Tönshoff B; Pape L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135439. PubMed ID: 26407177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-yr safety and efficacy of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine in de novo pediatric kidney transplant patients.
Ferraresso M; Belingheri M; Ginevri F; Murer L; Dello Strologo L; Cardillo M; Parodi A; Ghirardo G; Guzzo I; Innocente A; Ghio L
Pediatr Transplant; 2014 Jun; 18(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 24802342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. De novo everolimus-based therapy in renal transplant recipients: effect on proteinuria and renal prognosis.
Loriga G; Ciccarese M; Pala PG; Satta RP; Fanelli V; Manca ML; Serra G; Dessole P; Cossu M
Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 20534285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early steroid withdrawal protocol with basiliximab, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal-transplant recipients.
Kato Y; Tojimbara T; Iwadoh K; Koyama I; Nanmoku K; Kai K; Sannomiya A; Nakajima I; Fuchinoue S; Teraoka S
Int Immunopharmacol; 2006 Dec; 6(13-14):1984-92. PubMed ID: 17161352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and rationale of the ATHENA study--A 12-month, multicentre, prospective study evaluating the outcomes of a de novo everolimus-based regimen in combination with reduced cyclosporine or tacrolimus versus a standard regimen in kidney transplant patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Sommerer C; Suwelack B; Dragun D; Schenker P; Hauser IA; Nashan B; Thaiss F
Trials; 2016 Feb; 17():92. PubMed ID: 26888217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of kidney transplantation with cyclosporine- and everolimus-based immunosuppression.
Iaria G; Pisani F; Iorio B; Lucchesi C; De Luca L; Ielpo B; D'Andria D; Tariciotti L; Tisone G
Transplant Proc; 2006 May; 38(4):1018-9. PubMed ID: 16757249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.
Offner G; Toenshoff B; Höcker B; Krauss M; Bulla M; Cochat P; Fehrenbach H; Fischer W; Foulard M; Hoppe B; Hoyer PF; Jungraithmayr TC; Klaus G; Latta K; Leichter H; Mihatsch MJ; Misselwitz J; Montoya C; Müller-Wiefel DE; Neuhaus TJ; Pape L; Querfeld U; Plank C; Schwarke D; Wygoda S; Zimmerhackl LB
Transplantation; 2008 Nov; 86(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 19005406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone in DR-matched de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Asberg A; Midtvedt K; Line PD; Narverud J; Holdaas H; Jenssen T; Reisaeter AV; Johnsen LF; Fauchald P; Hartmann A
Transplantation; 2006 Jul; 82(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 16861943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U;
Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial with steroids and antithymocyte globulins comparing cyclosporine/azathioprine versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (CATM2) in renal transplantation.
Vacher-Coponat H; Moal V; Indreies M; Purgus R; Loundou A; Burtey S; Brunet P; Moussi-Frances J; Daniel L; Dussol B; Berland Y
Transplantation; 2012 Feb; 93(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 22228415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
