191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27491287)
1. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system.
Wen TJ; Wen YW; Chien CR; Chiang SC; Hsu WW; Shen LJ; Hsiao FY
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 27491287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer in Taiwan.
Tseng TH; Chiang SC; Hsu JC; Ko Y
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303294. PubMed ID: 38857244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.
Weycker D; Li X; Tzivelekis S; Atwood M; Garcia J; Li Y; Reiner M; Lyman GH
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Feb; 25(2):439-447. PubMed ID: 27734153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of white blood cell growth factor use among a large nationwide cohort of elderly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy.
Gruschkus SK; Lairson D; Dunn JK; Risser J; Du XL
Value Health; 2011; 14(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 21402294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia: an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Gerlier L; Lamotte M; Awada A; Bosly A; Bries G; Cocquyt V; Focan C; Henry S; Lalami Y; Machiels JP; Mebis J; Straetmans N; Verhoeven D; Somers L
BMC Cancer; 2010 Nov; 10():642. PubMed ID: 21092320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in secondary prophylaxis for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cheung MC; Prica A; Graczyk J; Buckstein R; Chan KK
Leuk Lymphoma; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1865-75. PubMed ID: 26758765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suboptimal duration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Lin WT; Wen YW; Chien CR; Gau CS; Chiang SC; Hsiao FY
Clin Ther; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1287-94. PubMed ID: 25130388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neutropenic complications in advanced-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: implications for the use of prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).
Bobey N; Woodman RC
Clin Invest Med; 1998 Apr; 21(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 9562926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Younis T; Rayson D; Jovanovic S; Skedgel C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 27572552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.
Vitolo U; Angrili F; DeCosta L; Wetten S; Federico M
Med Oncol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):139. PubMed ID: 27822615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
