These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27491453)
1. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG. Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing. Yin H; Pardue MT Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flash electroretinography in standing horses using the DTL microfiber electrode. Komáromy AM; Andrew SE; Sapp HL; Brooks DE; Dawson WW Vet Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 6(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 12641840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents. Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full-field electroretinogram recorded with skin electrodes in normal adults. Fernandes AG; Salomão SR; Pereira JM; Berezovsky A Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016; 79(6):390-394. PubMed ID: 28076567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of varying skin surface electrode position on electroretinogram responses recorded using a handheld stimulating and recording system. Hobby AE; Kozareva D; Yonova-Doing E; Hossain IT; Katta M; Huntjens B; Hammond CJ; Binns AM; Mahroo OA Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 137(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30046929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a new fiber electrode prototype for clinical electroretinography. Berezovsky A; Pereira JM; Salomão SR; Santos VR; Schor P Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18641814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography. Kuze M; Uji Y Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10974293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes. Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroretinography in dogs using a fiber electrode prototype. Pereira AL; Montiani-Ferreira F; Santos VR; Salomão SR; Souza C; Berezovsky A Braz J Med Biol Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23558860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and results of photopic flash electroretinogram performed with skin electrodes in infants. Bui Quoc E; Albuisson E; Ingster-Moati I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 21748726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of DTL electrode position on the amplitude and implicit time of the electroretinogram. Brouwer AH; de Wit GC; de Boer JH; van Genderen MM Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 140(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 31686287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flash electroretinography: normative values with surface skin electrodes and no pupil dilation using a standard stimulation protocol. Papathanasiou ES; Papacostas SS Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 116(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 17610098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology. Kurtenbach A; Kramer S; Strasser T; Zrenner E; Langrová H Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28224239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison between subtraction skin electrodes and corneal-contact electrodes in flash electroretinograms]. Kaid T; Matsunag M; Hanaya J; Nakamura Y; Ohtani S; Miyat K; Kondo M Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 117(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23424970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults. Bradshaw K; Hansen R; Fulton A Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 109(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15675199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good? Woo J; Jung S; Gauvin M; Lachapelle P Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28741115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of light- and dark-adapted ERGs using a mydriasis-free, portable system: clinical classifications and normative data. Liu H; Ji X; Dhaliwal S; Rahman SN; McFarlane M; Tumber A; Locke J; Wright T; Vincent A; Westall C Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30357588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). McCulloch DL; Marmor MF; Brigell MG; Hamilton R; Holder GE; Tzekov R; Bach M Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 130(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25502644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes. Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]