These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27491453)
21. A novel method to reduce noise in electroretinography using skin electrodes: a study of noise level, inter-session variability, and reproducibility. Yamashita T; Miki A; Tabuchi A; Funada H; Kondo M Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):317-324. PubMed ID: 27278187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode. Kriss A Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 May; 16(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 8089032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes. Esakowitz L; Kriss A; Shawkat F Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():169-71. PubMed ID: 8325411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Optimization of a recording procedure of a multifocal electroretinogram]. Shamshinova AM; Seidova SF Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 19284094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of cone dysfunction induced by digoxin in dogs by multicolor electroretinography. Maehara S; Osawa A; Itoh N; Wakaiki S; Tsuzuki K; Seno T; Kushiro T; Yamashita K; Izumisawa Y; Kotani T Vet Ophthalmol; 2005; 8(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 16359364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ISCEV extended protocol for the dark-adapted red flash ERG. Thompson DA; Fujinami K; Perlman I; Hamilton R; Robson AG Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):191-197. PubMed ID: 29934801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Design of a new disposable ERG electrode. Hiroi K; Miyake M; Hashimoto T; Honda Y Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 8751335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Consecutive unilateral recording of the two eyes affects dark-adapted ERG responses, when compared to simultaneous bilateral recording. Ross M; Honig H; Ezra-Elia R; Banin E; Obolensky A; Averbukh E; Rosov A; Gootwine E; Ofri R Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):183-192. PubMed ID: 30411184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new DTL-electrode holder for recording of electroretinograms in animals. Schatz A; Willmann G; Enderle H; Sliesoraityte I; Messias A; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Zrenner E; Gekeler F J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Feb; 195(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 21075141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Safety and efficacy evaluation of a new ERG electrode (the LVP electrode) part II. Flash ERG pilot study. Mohan Ram LS; Jalali S; Faheemuddin S; Das T; Nutheti R Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 107(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 14661908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Skin electrodes for electroretinography in unsedated children]. Baier C; Krastel H; Schapp O; Alexandridis E Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 8963144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Hébert M; Lachapelle P; Dumont M Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 8899303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of DTL and gold cup skin electrodes for recordings of the multifocal electroretinogram. Eckermann T; Hoffmann MB; Al-Nosairy KO Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 146(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 36536110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode. García-García Á; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 27665467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing nonsedated handheld cone flicker electroretingram as a screening test in pediatric patients: comparison to sedated conventional cone flicker electroretinogram. Osigian CJ; Grace SF; Cavuoto KM; Feuer WJ; Tavakoli M; Saksiriwutto P; Liu M; Capo H; Lam BL J AAPOS; 2019 Feb; 23(1):34.e1-34.e5. PubMed ID: 30625363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode. Lachapelle P; Benoit J; Little JM; Lachapelle B Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 8334927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes. Coupland SG; Janaky M Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Apr; 71(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 2791850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of ERGs with contact lens and adhesive skin electrodes. Chen D; Greenstein VC; Brodie SE Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 144(3):203-215. PubMed ID: 35304683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram. Mentzer AE; Eifler DM; Montiani-Ferreira F; Tuntivanich N; Forcier JQ; Petersen-Jones SM Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 111(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 16514491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Studies on skin-electrode ERG in the closed-eye state. Uchida K; Mitsuyu-Tsuboi M; Honda Y J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1979; 16(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 438933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]