BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27492723)

  • 1. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
    Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Agreement Between Computed Tomography Measurements of Glenoid Bone Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability With and Without Comparison With the Contralateral Shoulder.
    Milano G; Saccomanno MF; Magarelli N; Bonomo L
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Dec; 43(12):2918-26. PubMed ID: 26473013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Superiority of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography over Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Established Methodology.
    Weber AE; Bolia IK; Horn A; Villacis D; Omid R; Tibone JE; White E; Hatch GF
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 34094013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of humeral head measurements performed using two- and three-dimensional computed tomography in patients with shoulder instability.
    Stefaniak J; Kubicka AM; Wawrzyniak A; Romanowski L; Lubiatowski P
    Int Orthop; 2020 Oct; 44(10):2049-2056. PubMed ID: 32712787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.
    Hardy A; Loriaut P; Granger B; Neffati A; Massein A; Casabianca L; Pascal-Moussellard H; Gerometta A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jan; 26(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 27734111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques.
    Bois AJ; Fening SD; Polster J; Jones MH; Miniaci A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Nov; 40(11):2569-77. PubMed ID: 23019250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss With Arthroscopic Defect Size Estimation in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability.
    Bakshi NK; Patel I; Jacobson JA; Debski RE; Sekiya JK
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1880-5. PubMed ID: 25980922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.
    Moineau G; Levigne C; Boileau P; Young A; Walch G;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 22964089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.
    Budge MD; Lewis GS; Schaefer E; Coquia S; Flemming DJ; Armstrong AD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 21324716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-observer agreement of CT measurement of the glenoid bone surface by the CT Pico method: Comparison with laser in a cadaveric model.
    De Filippo M; Saba L; Negrini G; Silva M; Pedrazzi G; Pogliacomi F; Castagna A
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Oct; 44(10):1491-7. PubMed ID: 26130069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
    Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of the measurement of glenoid bone defect in anterior shoulder instability.
    Wu YG; Zhang HL; Hao YF; Jiang CY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Nov; 132(21):2559-2564. PubMed ID: 31651518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Hoenecke HR; Hermida JC; Flores-Hernandez C; D'Lima DD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 19959378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface.
    Moraiti C; Klouche S; Werthel JD; Bauer T; Hardy P
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 27699459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss.
    Bishop JY; Jones GL; Rerko MA; Donaldson C;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 471(4):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22996361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allows for Accurate Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss Compared With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
    Lansdown DA; Cvetanovich GL; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Bach BR; Nicholson G; Romeo A; Dawe R; Yanke AB
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Mar; 35(3):734-740. PubMed ID: 30733040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quantification of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability; MR-arthro compared to 3D-CT.
    Markenstein JE; Jaspars KC; van der Hulst VP; Willems WJ
    Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 24442561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Nofsinger C; Browning B; Burkhart SS; Pedowitz RA
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Mar; 27(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21195579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-observer and interobserver reliability of the 'Pico' computed tomography method for quantification of glenoid bone defect in anterior shoulder instability.
    Magarelli N; Milano G; Sergio P; Santagada DA; Fabbriciani C; Bonomo L
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1071-5. PubMed ID: 19466406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.