These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27493469)

  • 1. Quality of Communication in Robotic Surgery and Surgical Outcomes.
    Schiff L; Tsafrir Z; Aoun J; Taylor A; Theoharis E; Eisenstein D
    JSLS; 2016; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 27493469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of a wireless audio system on communication in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: A prospective controlled trial.
    Tsafrir Z; Janosek-Albright K; Aoun J; Diaz-Insua M; Abd-El-Barr AE; Schiff L; Talukdar S; Menon M; Munkarah A; Theoharis E; Eisenstein D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0220214. PubMed ID: 31923185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
    Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
    Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss.
    Pitter MC; Anderson P; Blissett A; Pemberton N
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Jun; 4(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18382994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
    Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.
    Catchpole K; Perkins C; Bresee C; Solnik MJ; Sherman B; Fritch J; Gross B; Jagannathan S; Hakami-Majd N; Avenido R; Anger JT
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3749-61. PubMed ID: 26675938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.
    Iraniha A; Peloquin J
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 28707149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anticipation, teamwork and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery.
    Sexton K; Johnson A; Gotsch A; Hussein AA; Cavuoto L; Guru KA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Feb; 27(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 28689193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
    Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
    Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of operating time over the years for robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology and gynecologic oncology.
    Rajanbabu A; Patel V; Anandita A; Burde K; Appukuttan A
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):215-219. PubMed ID: 32452011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations of Intraoperative Flow Disruptions and Operating Room Teamwork During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Weigl M; Weber J; Hallett E; Pfandler M; Schlenker B; Becker A; Catchpole K
    Urology; 2018 Apr; 114():105-113. PubMed ID: 29371162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
    Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis.
    Lindfors A; Åkesson Å; Staf C; Sjöli P; Sundfeldt K; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 May; 28(4):692-699. PubMed ID: 29557825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.