These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27495847)

  • 21. Re: Lethal Prostate Cancer in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.
    Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1677. PubMed ID: 27845108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.
    Walsh AL; Considine SW; Thomas AZ; Lynch TH; Manecksha RP
    Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Dec; 64(629):e783-7. PubMed ID: 25452543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Focus on the screening for prostate cancer by PSA].
    Roumeguère T; Van Velthoven R
    Rev Med Brux; 2013 Sep; 34(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 24195246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.
    Gomella LG; Liu XS; Trabulsi EJ; Kelly WK; Myers R; Showalter T; Dicker A; Wender R
    Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5875-83. PubMed ID: 22018148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of DRE and PSA in the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Moul JW
    J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S208-S209. PubMed ID: 28010975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Value of determining prostate-specific antigen for early detection or prostatic carcinoma].
    Hammerer P; Huland H
    Urologe A; 1995 Jul; 34(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 7545842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening for prostate cancer: are digital rectal examinations being performed?
    Federman DG; Pitkin P; Carbone V; Concato J; Kravetz JD
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2014 Apr; 42(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 24769789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
    Dell'Atti L
    J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
    Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Relationship between screening by stratifying cases into groups on prostate specific antigen level and the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic sextant prostate biopsy].
    Cao XL; Gao JP; Han G; Tang J; Hong BF
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):372-5. PubMed ID: 16638344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate biopsy.
    Nazim SM; Raza SJ; Ather MH
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jul; 23(7):529-30. PubMed ID: 23823969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Serum prostate-specific antigen hemodilution among obese men undergoing screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
    Grubb RL; Black A; Izmirlian G; Hickey TP; Pinsky PF; Mabie JE; Riley TL; Ragard LR; Prorok PC; Berg CD; Crawford ED; Church TR; Andriole GL;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):748-51. PubMed ID: 19258472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial.
    Pinsky PF; Kramer BS; Crawford ED; Grubb RL; Urban DA; Andriole GL; Chia D; Levin DL; Gohagan JK
    Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):352-6. PubMed ID: 16904451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
    Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Japanese guideline for prostate cancer screening.
    Hamashima C; Nakayama T; Sagawa M; Saito H; Sobue T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 39(6):339-51. PubMed ID: 19346535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for prostate cancer.
    Brawley OW; Ankerst DP; Thompson IM
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2009; 59(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 19564245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
    Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prostate cancer detection by using digital rectal examination: contemporary practice patterns in the United States.
    Tourville EA; Nguyen MM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2013 Sep; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 23647941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [New challenges and earlier approved methods in the laboratory diagnosis of prostate cancer].
    Kovács GL
    Magy Onkol; 2014 Dec; 58(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 25517448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re: Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations.
    Lucca I; Shariat SF
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):205-6. PubMed ID: 27302292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.