170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27496252)
1. Changes in biting forces with implant-supported overdenture in the lower jaw: A comparison between conventional and mini implants in a pilot study.
Hasan I; Madarlis C; Keilig L; Dirk C; Weber A; Bourauel C; Heinemann F
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():116-122. PubMed ID: 27496252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numerical investigation of complete mandibular dentures stabilized by conventional or mini implants in patient individual models.
Lohmann A; Keilig L; Heinemann F; Bourauel C; Hasan I
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Feb; 64(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29420301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Slagter AP; van't Hof MA; Geertman ME; Kalk W
J Dent Res; 1998 Oct; 77(10):1832-9. PubMed ID: 9786640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain and instability during biting with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Fontijn-Tekamp FA; Slagter AP; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11168270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aunmeungtong W; Kumchai T; Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Khongkhunthian P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27804205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.
Al-Magaleh WR; Abbas NA; Amer AA; Abdelkader AA; Bahgat B
Implant Dent; 2016 Apr; 25(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26684910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Changes in Brain Activity and Cognitive Function of Edentulous Patients, with Dentures and Two-Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture-Pilot Study.
Banu R F; Veeravalli PT; Kumar V A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 18(3):580-7. PubMed ID: 25825258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants.
Solberg K; Heinemann F; Pellikaan P; Keilig L; Stark H; Bourauel C; Hasan I
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):770-782. PubMed ID: 28279083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial.
Jofré J; Hamada T; Nishimura M; Klattenhoff C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 20070758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seven-year follow-up results of TiUnite implants supporting mandibular overdentures: early versus delayed loading.
Turkyilmaz I; Tozum TF; Fuhrmann DM; Tumer C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e83-90. PubMed ID: 21745326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
