These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27496298)

  • 1. Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.
    Ehlert MJ; Gupta P; Park J; Sirls LT
    Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():86-91. PubMed ID: 27496298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoyte L; Rabbanifard R; Mezzich J; Bassaly R; Downes K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 23143426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.
    Dandolu V; Akiyama M; Allenback G; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 27562466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients.
    Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of a Dedicated Robotic Team on Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 28430728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.
    Moore R; Moriarty C; Chinthakanan O; Miklos J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):887-892. PubMed ID: 27766346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Myers EM; Siff L; Osmundsen B; Geller E; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Apr; 26(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 25366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.
    Waite KE; Herman MA; Doyle PJ
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 27112781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Osmundsen BC; Clark A; Goldsmith C; Adams K; Denman MA; Edwards R; Gregory WT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 22453317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Secondary surgery after vaginal prolapse repair with mesh is more common for stress incontinence and voiding dysfunction than for mesh problems or prolapse recurrence.
    Bartley JM; Sirls LT; Killinger KA; Boura JA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Apr; 47(4):609-15. PubMed ID: 25697161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
    Wlodarczyk J; Brabender D; Gupta A; Gaur K; Madiedo A; Lee SW; Hsieh C
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 36315284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
    Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.