These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27496298)

  • 21. [Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].
    Elliott DS; Chow GK
    Ann Urol (Paris); 2007 Feb; 41(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17338498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    South MM; Foster RT; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Amundsen CL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):615.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. National Trends in the Performance of Robot-Assisted Sacral Colpopexy.
    Flack CK; Monn MF; Patel NB; Gardner TA; Powell CR
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):777-83. PubMed ID: 25654587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy.
    El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 36729164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Frank I; Dimarco DS; Chow GK
    Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. PubMed ID: 15476652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost analysis of surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or transvaginal mesh.
    Carracedo D; López-Fando L; Sánchez MD; Jiménez MÁ; Gómez JM; Laso I; Rodríguez MÁ; Burgos FJ
    Actas Urol Esp; 2017 Mar; 41(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27614392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safety of Mesh for Vaginal Cystocele Repair: Analysis of National Patient Characteristics and Complications.
    Theofanides MC; Onyeji I; Matulay J; Sui W; James M; Chung DE
    J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):632-637. PubMed ID: 28396182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic
    Alharthi S; Reilly M; Arishi A; Ahmed AM; Chulkov M; Qu W; Ortiz J; Nazzal M; Pannell S
    Am Surg; 2020 Mar; 86(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 32223807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study].
    Menzella D; Thubert T; Joubert M; Lauratet B; Kouchner P; Lefranc JP
    Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(17):1482-8. PubMed ID: 24286549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
    Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States.
    Leow JJ; Reese SW; Jiang W; Lipsitz SR; Bellmunt J; Trinh QD; Chung BI; Kibel AS; Chang SL
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 24491306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS
    Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy Using Barbed Suture Anchoring and Peritoneal Tunneling Technique: Tips and Tricks.
    Guan X; Ma Y; Gisseman J; Kleithermes C; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 27344033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Geller EJ; Siddiqui NY; Wu JM; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 19037026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.