These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27496571)

  • 1. [Does the paper speed in fetal heart monitoring during labour influence the variability in the interpretation by professionals?].
    Lemoine H; Ehlinger V; Groussolles M; Arnaud C; Vayssière C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):827-834. PubMed ID: 27496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
    Garabedian C; Butruille L; Drumez E; Servan Schreiber E; Bartolo S; Bleu G; Mesdag V; Deruelle P; De Jonckheere J; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
    Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians?
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation.
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo G; Agosti M; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F
    BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1657-64. PubMed ID: 23061674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
    Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of chart speed on fetal monitor interpretation.
    Peleg D; Ram R; Warsof SL; Wolf MF; Larion S; Beydoun HA; Trochakerian S; Ben Shachar I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(10):1577-80. PubMed ID: 26100761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome.
    Czabański R; Jezewski J; Wróbel J; Sikora J; Jezewski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 23488308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
    Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement of three interpretation systems of intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring by different levels of physicians.
    Pruksanusak N; Thongphanang P; Chainarong N; Suntharasaj T; Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Petpichetchian C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 37(8):996-999. PubMed ID: 28599582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
    Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ashwal E; Shinar S; Aviram A; Orbach S; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 29096560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Pereira-Leite L
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Dec; 106(12):1307-10. PubMed ID: 10609727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
    Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities.
    Pinto P; Costa-Santos C; Gonçalves H; Ayres-De-Campos D; Bernardes J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Nov; 15():301. PubMed ID: 26585345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.