235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27496794)
1. Post-standardization of routine creatinine assays: are they suitable for clinical applications.
Jassam N; Weykamp C; Thomas A; Secchiero S; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M; Thelen M; Cobbaert C; Perich C; Ricós C; Paula FA; Barth JH
Ann Clin Biochem; 2017 May; 54(3):386-394. PubMed ID: 27496794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of the recalibration of creatinine measurement with the modular Beckman Coulter Jaffe creatinine method.
Fillée C; Vranken G; Othmane M; Philippe M; Allaeys JM; Courbe A; Ruelle JL; Peeters R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1987-99. PubMed ID: 21801031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enzymatic creatinine assays allow estimation of glomerular filtration rate in stages 1 and 2 chronic kidney disease using CKD-EPI equation.
Kuster N; Cristol JP; Cavalier E; Bargnoux AS; Halimi JM; Froissart M; Piéroni L; Delanaye P;
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jan; 428():89-95. PubMed ID: 24220551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques.
Drion I; Cobbaert C; Groenier KH; Weykamp C; Bilo HJ; Wetzels JF; Kleefstra N
BMC Nephrol; 2012 Oct; 13():133. PubMed ID: 23043743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays?
Vickery S; Stevens PE; Dalton RN; van Lente F; Lamb EJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2439-45. PubMed ID: 16720592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and Analytical Impact of Moving from Jaffe to Enzymatic Serum Creatinine Methodology.
Syme NR; Stevens K; Stirling C; McMillan DC; Talwar D
J Appl Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 5(4):631-642. PubMed ID: 32447368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine serum creatinine measurements: how well do we perform?
Hoste L; Deiteren K; Pottel H; Callewaert N; Martens F
BMC Nephrol; 2015 Feb; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25803560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interlaboratory Variability in Plasma Creatinine Measurement and the Relation with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis.
Lee E; Collier CP; White CA
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 27827312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent trends in performance and current state of creatinine assays.
Killeen AA; Ashwood ER; Ventura CB; Styer P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 23544939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between IDMS-traceable Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays for estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the CKD-EPI equation in healthy and diabetic subjects.
Cheuiche AV; Soares AA; Camargo EG; Weinert LS; Camargo JL; Silveiro SP
Clin Biochem; 2013 Oct; 46(15):1423-9. PubMed ID: 23747959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enzymatic assays for creatinine: time for action.
Panteghini M
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2008; 241():84-8. PubMed ID: 18569972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the impact of standardization process on the quality of serum creatinine determination in Italian laboratories.
Carobene A; Ceriotti F; Infusino I; Frusciante E; Panteghini M
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jan; 427():100-6. PubMed ID: 24144863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lower creatinine concentration values and lower inter-laboratory variation among Swedish hospital laboratories in 2014 compared to 1996: results from the Equalis external quality assessment program.
Helmersson-Karlqvist J; Ridefelt P; Boija EE; Nordin G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 May; 57(6):838-844. PubMed ID: 30982002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enzymatic assays for creatinine: time for action.
Panteghini M;
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 18298343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trueness verification of actual creatinine assays in the European market demonstrates a disappointing variability that needs substantial improvement. An international study in the framework of the EC4 creatinine standardization working group.
Delanghe JR; Cobbaert C; Galteau MM; Harmoinen A; Jansen R; Kruse R; Laitinen P; Thienpont LM; Wuyts B; Weykamp C; Panteghini M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(9):1319-25. PubMed ID: 18605952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large inter-assay difference of serum creatinine in pediatric population: a threat to accurate staging of chronic kidney disease.
Lao K; Sykes E; van Wijk XMR; Li J; Williams J; Gherasim C; Sun Q
Pediatr Nephrol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 34757479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Compensated creatinine method and glomerular filtration rate estimation in a heterogeneous population of patients].
Soldo F; Brzak M; Vrkić N
Acta Med Croatica; 2012 Jul; 66(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 23441532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional implementation of creatinine measurement standardization.
Komenda P; Beaulieu M; Seccombe D; Levin A
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 18003780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multicentric evaluation of IDMS-traceable creatinine enzymatic assays.
Piéroni L; Delanaye P; Boutten A; Bargnoux AS; Rozet E; Delatour V; Carlier MC; Hanser AM; Cavalier E; Froissart M; Cristol JP;
Clin Chim Acta; 2011 Nov; 412(23-24):2070-5. PubMed ID: 21803031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenindione interference in enzymatic creatinine assay - A case report.
Natarajan B; Hart T; Smith S; Parry RG
Clin Nephrol; 2015 Feb; 83(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 24361058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
