These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27497054)

  • 1. Do German drivers use their smartphones safely?-Not really!
    Vollrath M; Huemer AK; Teller C; Likhacheva A; Fricke J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():29-38. PubMed ID: 27497054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-world effects of using a phone while driving on lateral and longitudinal control of vehicles.
    Dozza M; Flannagan CA; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2015 Dec; 55():81-7. PubMed ID: 26683550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do we really need to use our smartphones while driving?
    Musicant O; Lotan T; Albert G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():13-21. PubMed ID: 26364139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
    Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Texting at the light and other forms of device distraction behind the wheel.
    Bernstein JJ; Bernstein J
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():968. PubMed ID: 26407864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Simmons SM; Hicks A; Caird JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Feb; 87():161-9. PubMed ID: 26724505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.
    Morgenstern T; Petzoldt T; Krems JF; Naujoks F; Keinath A
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():235-243. PubMed ID: 32563398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prevalence of distraction among passenger vehicle drivers: a roadside observational approach.
    Huisingh C; Griffin R; McGwin G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 24761827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of texting on young drivers' behavior and safety on urban and rural roads through a simulation experiment.
    Yannis G; Laiou A; Papantoniou P; Christoforou C
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():25-31. PubMed ID: 24913482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are cellular phone blocking applications effective for novice teen drivers?
    Creaser JI; Edwards CJ; Morris NL; Donath M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():75-8. PubMed ID: 26403905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.
    McDonald CC; Sommers MS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. PubMed ID: 26436243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students.
    Rudisill TM; Zhu M
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):888-93. PubMed ID: 26688117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the impact of "soft blocking" on smartphone usage of young drivers.
    Albert G; Lotan T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():56-62. PubMed ID: 30731315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Texting while driving using Google Glass™: Promising but not distraction-free.
    He J; Choi W; McCarley JS; Chaparro BS; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():218-29. PubMed ID: 26024837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of observational studies on secondary task engagement while driving.
    Huemer AK; Schumacher M; Mennecke M; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():225-236. PubMed ID: 30055511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drivers' phone use at red traffic lights: a roadside observation study comparing calls and visual-manual interactions.
    Huth V; Sanchez Y; Brusque C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():42-8. PubMed ID: 25463943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An observational study of driving distractions on urban roads in Spain.
    Prat F; Planes M; Gras ME; Sullman MJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():8-16. PubMed ID: 25463939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.