These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27498891)

  • 1. Delayed N2 response in Go condition in a visual Go/Nogo ERP study in children who stutter.
    Piispala J; Kallio M; Bloigu R; Jansson-Verkasalo E
    J Fluency Disord; 2016 Jun; 48():16-26. PubMed ID: 27498891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atypical brain activation in children who stutter in a visual Go/Nogo task: An ERP study.
    Piispala J; Määttä S; Pääkkönen A; Bloigu R; Kallio M; Jansson-Verkasalo E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 128(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 27919012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Jansson-Verkasalo E; Eggers K; Järvenpää A; Suominen K; Van den Bergh B; De Nil L; Kujala T
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreased occipital alpha oscillation in children who stutter during a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Piispala J; Starck T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Kallio M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 129(9):1971-1980. PubMed ID: 30029047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ERP Study of Response Inhibition in the Auditory Domain in Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.
    Gerhold MM; Jacobson SW; Jacobson JL; Molteno CD; Meintjes EM; Andrew CM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Jan; 41(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 27925227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibitory control in childhood stuttering.
    Eggers K; De Nil LF; Van den Bergh BR
    J Fluency Disord; 2013 Mar; 38(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23540909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment on Go/NoGo Semantic Categorization Task Performance and Event-Related Potentials.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Eroh J; Nguyen LT; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Kung F; Kraut MA; Hart J
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 26836634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of age in the search for ERP biomarkers of aMCI.
    Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Mar; 142():108-115. PubMed ID: 30721717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.
    Maxfield ND
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2906-2923. PubMed ID: 28973156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.