These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27499041)

  • 1. Editorial commentary: Fractional flow reserve-A diagnostic tool, a prognostic index.
    Barbato E
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2017 Feb; 27(2):121-122. PubMed ID: 27499041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From Lumenogram to "Functional Angiography" and the Evolution of Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Papafaklis MI; Baumbach A
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(4):485-488. PubMed ID: 30586782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
    Nakanishi R; Matsumoto S; Alani A; Li D; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Koo BK; Min JK; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractional Flow Reserve in Acute Coronary Syndromes.
    Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NHJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 68(11):1192-1194. PubMed ID: 27609681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impacts on healthcare when coronary angiography as the reference method for diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery disease is replaced by fractional flow reserve!
    Carlsson M
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Apr; 38(13):999-1001. PubMed ID: 27143782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
    Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
    Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
    Baumann S; Renker M; Hetjens S; Fuller SR; Becher T; Loßnitzer D; Lehmann R; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Lang S; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 27639627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemia-causing coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis.
    Ding A; Qiu G; Lin W; Hu L; Lu G; Long X; Hong X; Chen Y; Luo X; Tang Q; Deng D
    Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 34(12):795-808. PubMed ID: 27796727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve: a review: invasive imaging.
    De Bruyne B; Sarma J
    Heart; 2008 Jul; 94(7):949-59. PubMed ID: 18552231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From fallacies to reality: Focus on fractional flow reserve.
    Barbato E; Knuuti J; Wijns W
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Nov; 319():61. PubMed ID: 33012425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic Relevance of Discordant Results Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Resting Indices.
    Kubo T; Shiono Y
    Circ J; 2019 Oct; 83(11):2203-2204. PubMed ID: 31511441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study.
    Kolli KK; Min JK; Ha S; Soohoo H; Xiong G
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Jun; 5(7):. PubMed ID: 27364988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve.
    Shiono Y; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Wada T; Ota S; Ozaki Y; Orii M; Shimamura K; Ishibashi K; Yamano T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 84(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 24265210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.