144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27499098)
1. The influence of social category cues on the happy categorisation advantage depends on expression valence.
Craig BM; Koch S; Lipp OV
Cogn Emot; 2017 Nov; 31(7):1493-1501. PubMed ID: 27499098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial race and sex cues have a comparable influence on emotion recognition in Chinese and Australian participants.
Craig BM; Zhang J; Lipp OV
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2212-2223. PubMed ID: 28681183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facial age cues and emotional expression interact asymmetrically: age cues moderate emotion categorisation.
Craig BM; Lipp OV
Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):350-362. PubMed ID: 28366112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces.
Hugenberg K
Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 16187863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. You look pretty happy: Attractiveness moderates emotion perception.
Lindeberg S; Craig BM; Lipp OV
Emotion; 2019 Sep; 19(6):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 30234330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emotional expressions preferentially elicit implicit evaluations of faces also varying in race or age.
Craig BM; Lipp OV; Mallan KM
Emotion; 2014 Oct; 14(5):865-77. PubMed ID: 25046242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration.
Craig BM; Mallan KM; Lipp OV
Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1303-14. PubMed ID: 22642347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When men are wonderful: A larger happy face facilitation effect for male (vs. female) faces for male participants.
Tipples J
Emotion; 2023 Oct; 23(7):2080-2093. PubMed ID: 36892870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intergroup processes and the happy face advantage: How social categories influence emotion categorization.
Martin D; Hutchison J; Konopka AE; Dallimore CJ; Slessor G; Swainson R
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Mar; 126(3):390-412. PubMed ID: 38647440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Featural vs. Holistic processing and visual sampling in the influence of social category cues on emotion recognition.
Craig BM; Chen NTM; Lipp OV
Cogn Emot; 2022 Aug; 36(5):855-875. PubMed ID: 35353033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Categorising intersectional targets: An "either/and" approach to race- and gender-emotion congruity.
Smith JS; LaFrance M; Dovidio JF
Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 26371750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceiving happiness in an intergroup context: The role of race and attention to the eyes in differentiating between true and false smiles.
Friesen JP; Kawakami K; Vingilis-Jaremko L; Caprara R; Sidhu DM; Williams A; Hugenberg K; Rodríguez-Bailón R; Cañadas E; Niedenthal P
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Mar; 116(3):375-395. PubMed ID: 30614725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying the attractor field model to social cognition: Perceptual discrimination is facilitated, but memory is impaired for faces displaying evaluatively congruent expressions.
Corneille O; Hugenberg K; Potter T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):335-52. PubMed ID: 17723052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
Aguado L; Martínez-García N; Solís-Olce A; Dieguez-Risco T; Hinojosa JA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():66-76. PubMed ID: 29751931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder.
Maoz K; Eldar S; Stoddard J; Pine DS; Leibenluft E; Bar-Haim Y
Psychiatry Res; 2016 Jul; 241():122-7. PubMed ID: 27173656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task.
Neta M; Davis FC; Whalen PJ
Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1425-33. PubMed ID: 21707167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Following in the wake of anger: when not discriminating is discriminating.
Shapiro JR; Ackerman JM; Neuberg SL; Maner JK; Vaughn Becker D; Kenrick DT
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1356-67. PubMed ID: 19622758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: a meta-analysis.
Nummenmaa L; Calvo MG
Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 25706834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seeing happy emotion in fearful and angry faces: qualitative analysis of facial expression recognition in a bilateral amygdala-damaged patient.
Sato W; Kubota Y; Okada T; Murai T; Yoshikawa S; Sengoku A
Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):727-42. PubMed ID: 12507042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Affective divergence: automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership.
Weisbuch M; Ambady N
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 18954194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
