These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1033 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27499519)
1. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve? Kamara E; Robinson J; Bas MA; Rodriguez JA; Hepinstall MS J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Domb BG; El Bitar YF; Sadik AY; Stake CE; Botser IB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Component Positioning Between Fluoroscopy-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. Stewart NJ; Stewart JL; Brisbin A J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1602-1605.e3. PubMed ID: 35314287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acetabular Placement Accuracy With the Direct Anterior Approach Freehand Technique. Soderquist MC; Scully R; Unger AS J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2748-2754. PubMed ID: 28499624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting? Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty? Bingham JS; Spangehl MJ; Hines JT; Taunton MJ; Schwartz AJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2927-2931. PubMed ID: 29853308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach. Ji W; Stewart N Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25957590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluoroscopically Guided Acetabular Component Positioning: Does It Reduce the Risk of Malpositioning in Obese Patients? Gosthe RG; Suarez JC; McNamara CA; Calvo C; Patel PD J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3052-3055. PubMed ID: 28641967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study. Tripuraneni KR; Munson NR; Archibeck MJ; Carothers JT J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2299-302. PubMed ID: 27067169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Guided Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Slotkin EM; Patel PD; Suarez JC J Arthroplasty; 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):102-6. PubMed ID: 26105615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Learning Curve From Converting From Fluoroscopic to Robotic-Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Masini MA; Sawaya KL; Harshberger A; Hameed D; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2024 Jul; 44():311-319. PubMed ID: 38697134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular Component Position and the Risk of Dislocation Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis. Sadhu A; Nam D; Coobs BR; Barrack TN; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):987-991. PubMed ID: 27633947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. El Bitar YF; Jackson TJ; Lindner D; Botser IB; Stake CE; Domb BG Orthopedics; 2015 Jan; 38(1):e31-7. PubMed ID: 25611417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach. Belyea CM; Lansford JL; Yim DG Mil Med; 2022 Jan; 187(1-2):e11-e16. PubMed ID: 33231690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does robotic-assisted computer navigation improve acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III/IV hip dysplasia? A propensity score case-match analysis. Chai W; Xu C; Guo RW; Kong XP; Fu J; Tang PF; Chen JY Int Orthop; 2022 Apr; 46(4):769-777. PubMed ID: 34997288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion. Boettner F; Zingg M; Emara AK; Waldstein W; Faschingbauer M; Kasparek MF J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27839959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does robotic assisted technology improve the accuracy of acetabular component positioning in patients with DDH? Zhou Y; Shao H; Huang Y; Deng W; Yang D; Bian T J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021; 29(2):23094990211025325. PubMed ID: 34308688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]