These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27500103)

  • 1. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed.
    Hong Y; Shoji N; Morita T; Hirasawa K; Matsumura K; Kasahara M; Shimizu K
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 27500103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
    Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular pressure measurement by three different tonometers in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Nowroozzadeh MH; Mehrabi Y; Aghazadeh-Amiri M
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26005552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM; Shimmyo M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 12():52. PubMed ID: 23009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer.
    Hemida AY; Said OM; Abdel-Meguid AAE; Iqbal M; Badawi AE
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 32420226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.
    Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
    Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
    Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.
    Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R; Chui WS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):909-14. PubMed ID: 17873777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.