BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27500103)

  • 1. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed.
    Hong Y; Shoji N; Morita T; Hirasawa K; Matsumura K; Kasahara M; Shimizu K
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 27500103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
    Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular pressure measurement by three different tonometers in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Nowroozzadeh MH; Mehrabi Y; Aghazadeh-Amiri M
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26005552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM; Shimmyo M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 12():52. PubMed ID: 23009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer.
    Hemida AY; Said OM; Abdel-Meguid AAE; Iqbal M; Badawi AE
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 32420226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.
    Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
    Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
    Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.
    Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R; Chui WS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):909-14. PubMed ID: 17873777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.