These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27500117)
1. Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review. Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(7):1057-65. PubMed ID: 27500117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of internal anterior chamber diameter imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy, Visante optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam. Kim SK; Kim HM; Song JS J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 20163076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements. Kohnen T; Thomala MC; Cichocki M; Strenger A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1809-13. PubMed ID: 17081862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies. Calvo-Sanz JA; Poyales F; Zhou Y; Arias-Puente A; Garzón N Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 35502031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of non-contact methods for the measurement of central corneal thickness. Gorgun E; Yenerel NM; Dinc UA; Oncel B; Kucumen RB; Oral D; Ciftci F Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(5):400-7. PubMed ID: 21899245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interchangeability among five devices that measure anterior eye distances. Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 25786342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of anterior segment measurements between four diagnostic imaging devices in myopic patients. Placide J; Neves Da Silva HV; McCabe SE; Ronquillo YC; Moshirfar M Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1235-1243. PubMed ID: 34846974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma. Sen E; Inanc M; Elgin U; Yilmazbas P Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):171-174. PubMed ID: 28108902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements Using 4 Different Devices. Shajari M; Lehmann UC; Kohnen T Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 27100654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam. Yazici AT; Bozkurt E; Alagoz C; Alagoz N; Pekel G; Kaya V; Yilmaz OF J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20163077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Frisch IB; Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Reuland AJ; Auffarth GU Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 17534811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of optical low-coherence reflectometry versus partial coherence interferometry biometry. Huang J; McAlinden C; Huang Y; Wen D; Savini G; Tu R; Wang Q Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43414. PubMed ID: 28233846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements conducted with Pentacam HR® and IOLMaster®. Németh G; Hassan Z; Módis L; Szalai E; Katona K; Berta A Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 21366184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of white-to-white measurements using four devices and their determination of ICL sizing. Ang RET; Reyes EKF; Ayuyao FAJ; Umali MIN; Cruz EM Eye Vis (Lond); 2022 Oct; 9(1):36. PubMed ID: 36182955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters. Özyol P; Özyol E Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():73-78. PubMed ID: 27320057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Buehl W; Stojanac D; Sacu S; Drexler W; Findl O Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16386970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers. Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]