164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27500339)
21. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hysterectomy in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
Weaver F; Hynes D; Goldberg JM; Khuri S; Daley J; Henderson W
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):880-4. PubMed ID: 11384689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time.
Margulies SL; Vargas MV; Denny K; Sparks AD; Marfori CQ; Moawad G; Amdur RL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):758-769. PubMed ID: 31098703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.
Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Venous Thromboembolism After Abdominal and Minimally Invasive Large Specimen Hysterectomy.
Pham NK; Jalloul RJ; Chen HY; Hui M; Leon MG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 30(11):884-889. PubMed ID: 37422052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of length of surgery on the incidence of venous thromboembolism after benign hysterectomy.
Moulder JK; Moore KJ; Strassle PD; Louie M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):364.e1-364.e7. PubMed ID: 33039394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characteristics associated with prolonged length of stay after hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions.
Agrawal S; Chen L; Tergas AI; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 219(1):89.e1-89.e15. PubMed ID: 29750957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benign hysterectomy performed by gynecologic oncologists: Is selection bias altering our ability to measure surgical quality?
Barber EL; Rossi EC; Alexander A; Bilimoria K; Simon MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 151(1):141-144. PubMed ID: 30121133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Readmission After Gynecologic Surgery: A Comparison of Procedures for Benign and Malignant Indications.
Cory L; Latif N; Brensinger C; Zhang X; Giuntoli RL; Burger RA; Morgan M; Ko E
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 130(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 28697106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shifting trends and sicker patients: Reassessing hysterectomy performed for benign indications by gynecologic oncologists.
Wang CC; Foley OW; Blank SV; Huh WK; Barber EL
Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 184():43-50. PubMed ID: 38277920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
Kovac SR
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):787-93. PubMed ID: 10831967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Postoperative Complications Following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Corrigan KE; Vargas MV; Robinson HN; Gu A; Wei C; Tyan P; Singh N; Tappy EE; Moawad GN
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):583-590. PubMed ID: 31212286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing Characteristics of and Postoperative Morbidity after Hysterectomy for Endometriosis versus other Benign Indications: A NSQIP Study.
Stewart KA; Tessier KM; Lebovic DI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):884-890.e2. PubMed ID: 35472598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data.
Mahdi H; Goodrich S; Lockhart D; DeBernardo R; Moslemi-Kebria M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):901-9. PubMed ID: 24768957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Indications and results of total hysterectomy.
Chryssikopoulos A; Loghis C
Int Surg; 1986; 71(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 3771122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
