These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27500899)

  • 1. Clusters of landscape characters as a way of communication in characterisation: A study from side, Turkey.
    Atik M; Işıklı RC; Ortaçeşme V
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 182():385-396. PubMed ID: 27500899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Landscape character assessment framework in rural area: A case study in Qiaokou, Chang-sha, China].
    Zhang Q; Liu WP; Yu ZR
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 May; 26(5):1537-47. PubMed ID: 26571675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Aesthetics theory and method of landscape resource assessment].
    Wang B; Wang B; He P
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Sep; 17(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 17147190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial modelling of landscape aesthetic potential in urban-rural fringes.
    Sahraoui Y; Clauzel C; Foltête JC
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():623-636. PubMed ID: 27474974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining recreational, scenic, and historical-cultural potentials of landscape features along a segment of the ancient Silk Road using factor analyzing.
    Kurdoglu O; Kurdoglu BC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Nov; 170(1-4):99-116. PubMed ID: 19862635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fell runners and walking walls: towards a sociology of living landscapes and aesthetic atmospheres as an alternative to a Lakeland picturesque.
    Nettleton S
    Br J Sociol; 2015 Dec; 66(4):759-78. PubMed ID: 26399836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of rural areas in terms of landscape quality: Salacik Village (Trabzon/Turkey) example.
    Düzgüneş E; Demirel Ö
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jun; 187(6):310. PubMed ID: 25934050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case investigation on the construction mode of rural landscapes in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, Mengda National Nature Reserve.
    Kang Y; Chen C
    Heliyon; 2024 Sep; 10(17):e37033. PubMed ID: 39296138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes.
    Sevenant M; Antrop M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(9):2889-99. PubMed ID: 18950929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing public aesthetic preferences towards some urban landscape patterns: the case study of two different geographic groups.
    Chen Z; Xu B; Devereux B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):4. PubMed ID: 26627209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data.
    van Zanten BT; Van Berkel DB; Meentemeyer RK; Smith JW; Tieskens KF; Verburg PH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(46):12974-12979. PubMed ID: 27799537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling aesthetics to support an ecosystem services approach for natural resource management decision making.
    Booth PN; Law SA; Ma J; Buonagurio J; Boyd J; Turnley J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):926-938. PubMed ID: 28418204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural landscapes and attributes of "culturalness" in protected areas: An exploratory assessment in Greece.
    Vlami V; Kokkoris IP; Zogaris S; Cartalis C; Kehayias G; Dimopoulos P
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Oct; 595():229-243. PubMed ID: 28384579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey).
    Bulut Z; Yilmaz H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Jun; 141(1-3):121-9. PubMed ID: 17786575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: the effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics.
    Kalivoda O; Vojar J; Skřivanová Z; Zahradník D
    J Environ Manage; 2014 May; 137():36-44. PubMed ID: 24594757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploration and Analysis of the Aesthetic Cognitive Schema of Contemporary Western Urban Landscapes.
    Gao S; Liu S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34067997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consensus in factors affecting landscape preference: A case study based on a cross-cultural comparison.
    Ren X
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 252():109622. PubMed ID: 31605910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions between landscape elements and tranquility evaluation based on eye tracking experiments (L).
    Ren X; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3019-22. PubMed ID: 26627775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Spatial characteristics analysis of Huizhou-Styled Village based on ideal ecosystem model and 3D landscape indices: A case in Chengkan, China].
    Yao MY; Yan SJ; Wu YL
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 27(12):3905-3912. PubMed ID: 29704349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads.
    Martín B; Ortega E; Otero I; Arce RM
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():324-34. PubMed ID: 27240208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.