These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27502426)

  • 1. A PROCESS OF PRIORITIZING TOPICS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN.
    Kosherbayeva L; Hailey D; Kurakbaev K; Tabarov A; Kumar A; Gutzskaya G; Stepkina E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 27502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mentoring a health technology assessment initiative in Kazakhstan.
    Muratov S; Hailey D; Foerster V; Brady B; Juzwishin D; la Fleur P; McGowan J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Apr; 30(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 24774034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH.
    Husereau D; Boucher M; Noorani H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 20584365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WORK IN A HOSPITAL IN KAZAKHSTAN.
    Kosherbayeva L; Hailey D; Kurakbaev K; Tsoy A; Zhuzzhanov O; Donbay A; Kumar A; Nadyrov K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(1-2):78-80. PubMed ID: 26956362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
    Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.
    Noorani HZ; Husereau DR; Boudreau R; Skidmore B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 17579932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting.
    Specchia ML; Favale M; Di Nardo F; Rotundo G; Favaretti C; Ricciardi W; de Waure C;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2015; 39(4 Suppl 1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26499414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A determination of topics for health technology assessment in Thailand: making decision makers involved.
    Lertpitakpong C; Chaikledkaew U; Thavorncharoensap M; Tantivess S; Praditsitthikorn N; Youngkong S; Yothasamut J; Udomsuk K; Sinthitichai K; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S100-9. PubMed ID: 19253492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand.
    Teerawattananon Y; Tantivess S; Yothasamut J; Kingkaew P; Chaisiri K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():241-52. PubMed ID: 19527543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health technology assessment development in China.
    Chen Y; Banta D; Tang Z
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():202-9. PubMed ID: 19575825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and selection of health technologies for assessment by agencies in support of reimbursement decisions in Latin America.
    Pichon-Riviere A; Augustovski F; García Martí S; Alcaraz A; Alfie V; Sampietro-Colom L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 Aug; 37(1):e80. PubMed ID: 34392842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design in Kazakhstan.
    Oortwijn W; Surgey G; Novakovic T; Baltussen R; Kosherbayeva L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritizing investments in health technology assessment. Can we assess potential value for money?
    Davies L; Drummond M; Papanikolaou P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 10815355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol.
    Gagnon MP; Candas B; Desmartis M; Gagnon J; La Roche D; Rhainds M; Coulombe M; Dipankui MT; Légaré F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Jun; 14():273. PubMed ID: 24950739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Priority setting for the health technology assessment].
    Poblete-Vargas S; Castillo-Laborde C
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142 Suppl 1():S22-6. PubMed ID: 24861176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Technology Assessment and Its Use in Drug Policy in Malaysia.
    Shafie AA; Chandriah H; Yong YV; Wan Puteh SE
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():145-150. PubMed ID: 31082794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model for HTA priority setting: experience in Lithuania.
    Jankauskiene D; Petronyte G
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Oct; 29(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 24290339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience.
    Shani S; Siebzehner MI; Luxenburg O; Shemer J
    Health Policy; 2000 Dec; 54(3):169-85. PubMed ID: 11154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.