BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27503758)

  • 1. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner.
    Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
    Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
    Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
    Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
    Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
    Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients: preliminary results.
    D'Angelo A; Rinaldi P; Belli P; D'Amico R; Carlino G; Grippo C; Giuliani M; Orlandi A; Infante A; Manfredi R
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Jan; 23(1):225-231. PubMed ID: 30657564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the early assessment of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an emerging role to monitoring tumor response?
    D'Angelo A; Orlandi A; Bufi E; Mercogliano S; Belli P; Manfredi R
    Radiol Med; 2021 Apr; 126(4):517-526. PubMed ID: 33385300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Compared with Handheld Ultrasound in Pre-Operative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinomas: A Pilot Study of 51 Cases.
    Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Yang B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 27339762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
    Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Value of Shear Wave Elastography Added to Targeted Ultrasound (Second-Look Ultrasound) in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions Suspicious of Malignancy Detected on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Lu FI; Lu H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2395-2406. PubMed ID: 30666681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
    Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detectability of breast lesions under the nipple using an automated breast volume scanner: comparison with handheld ultrasonography.
    Isobe S; Tozaki M; Yamaguchi M; Ogawa Y; Homma K; Satomi R; Saito M; Joo C; Fukuma E
    Jpn J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 29(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 21717306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Wang L; Qi ZH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 31130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.