These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504001)

  • 1. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Arsenault M; Bédard É; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32386199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic root, not valve, calcification correlates with coronary artery calcification in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A two-center study.
    Henein M; Hällgren P; Holmgren A; Sörensen K; Ibrahimi P; Kofoed KF; Larsen LH; Hassager C
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Dec; 243(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 26551591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of aortic valve calcium load by multidetector computed tomography. Anatomical validation, impact of scanner settings and incremental diagnostic value.
    Boulif J; Gerber B; Slimani A; Lazam S; de Meester C; Piérard S; Pasquet A; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; El Khoury G; de Kerchove L; Noirhomme P; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):360-366. PubMed ID: 28803719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes.
    Zhang B; Salaun E; Côté N; Wu Y; Mahjoub H; Mathieu P; Dahou A; Zenses AS; Clisson M; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 76(15):1737-1748. PubMed ID: 33032735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Watanabe Y; Chevalier B; Hayashida K; Leong T; Bouvier E; Arai T; Farge A; Hovasse T; Garot P; Cormier B; Morice MC; Lefèvre T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 25594190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic Valve Calcification Density Measured by MDCT in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity.
    Powers A; Ali M; Lavoie N; Haujir A; Mogensen NSB; Ludwig S; Øvrehus KA; Tastet L; Rhéaume C; Schofer N; Dahl JS; Clavel MA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 May; 17(5):e016267. PubMed ID: 38771899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indexed aortic valve area using multimodality imaging for assessing the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.
    Yagi N; Hasegawa H; Kuwajima K; Ogawa M; Yamane T; Shiota T
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Nov; 414():132416. PubMed ID: 39098616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age, Sex, and Valve Phenotype Differences in Fibro-Calcific Remodeling of Calcified Aortic Valve.
    Voisine M; Hervault M; Shen M; Boilard AJ; Filion B; Rosa M; Bossé Y; Mathieu P; Côté N; Clavel MA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 May; 9(10):e015610. PubMed ID: 32384012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systolic hypertension and progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis: results from the PROGRESSA study.
    Tastet L; Capoulade R; Clavel MA; Larose É; Shen M; Dahou A; Arsenault M; Mathieu P; Bédard É; Dumesnil JG; Tremblay A; Bossé Y; Després JP; Pibarot P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 18(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 26896413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of aortic valve phenotype and sex on aorta dilation in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Fleury MA; Tastet L; Bernard J; Shen M; Capoulade R; Abdoun K; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Beaudoin J; Bernier M; Salaun E; Côté N; Pibarot P; Hecht S
    Open Heart; 2024 Oct; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 39424304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
    Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges of recognizing bicuspid aortic valve in elderly patients undergoing TAVR.
    Kim WK; Liebetrau C; Fischer-Rasokat U; Renker M; Rolf A; Doss M; Möllmann H; Nef H; Walther T; Hamm CW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):251-256. PubMed ID: 31587128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering.
    Ferda J; Linhartová K; Kreuzberg B
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):471-5. PubMed ID: 17961946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex-Specific Differences in Aortic Valve Calcification Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Veulemans V; Hokken TW; Heermann J; Kardys I; Maier O; Adrichem R; Ooms J; Nuis RJ; Daemen J; Hirsch A; Budde RP; Zeus T; Van Mieghem NM
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 197():87-92. PubMed ID: 37137798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex-Related Discordance Between Aortic Valve Calcification and Hemodynamic Severity of Aortic Stenosis: Is Valvular Fibrosis the Explanation?
    Simard L; Côté N; Dagenais F; Mathieu P; Couture C; Trahan S; Bossé Y; Mohammadi S; Pagé S; Joubert P; Clavel MA
    Circ Res; 2017 Feb; 120(4):681-691. PubMed ID: 27879282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.
    Tchetche D; de Biase C; van Gils L; Parma R; Ochala A; Lefevre T; Hovasse T; De Backer O; Sondergaard L; Bleiziffer S; Lange R; Kornowski R; Landes U; Norgaard BL; Biasco L; Philippart R; Molina-Martin de Nicolas J; Mylotte D; Lemee C; Dumonteil N; Van Mieghem NM
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007107. PubMed ID: 30626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional Aortic Root Parameters and Expression of Aortopathy in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Girdauskas E; Rouman M; Disha K; Fey B; Dubslaff G; Theis B; Petersen I; Gutberlet M; Borger MA; Kuntze T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 67(15):1786-1796. PubMed ID: 27081018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.