These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504222)

  • 1. Characterization of Probe Dynamic Behaviors in Critical Dimension Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Feng SC; Joung CB; Vorburger TV
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2009; 114(4):2-214. PubMed ID: 27504222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational models of a nano probe tip for static behaviors.
    Feng SC; Vorburger TV; Joung CB; Dixson RG; Fu J; Ma L
    Scanning; 2008; 30(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18200506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of simulated scanning of atomic-scale silicon surface by atomic force microscopy.
    Lin ZC; Liu SC
    Scanning; 2008; 30(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 18623105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resonance frequencies of AFM cantilevers in contact with a surface.
    Verbiest GJ; Rost MJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Dec; 171():70-76. PubMed ID: 27615394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyzing the Effect of Capillary Force on Vibrational Performance of the Cantilever of an Atomic Force Microscope in Tapping Mode with Double Piezoelectric Layers in an Air Environment.
    Nahavandi A; Korayem MH
    Microsc Microanal; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1195-206. PubMed ID: 26324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate measurement of Atomic Force Microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration.
    Slattery AD; Blanch AJ; Quinton JS; Gibson CT
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Aug; 131():46-55. PubMed ID: 23685172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis the effect of different geometries of AFM's cantilever on the dynamic behavior and the critical forces of three-dimensional manipulation.
    Korayem MH; Saraie MB; Saraee MB
    Ultramicroscopy; 2017 Apr; 175():9-24. PubMed ID: 28110179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the tip mass on the tip-sample interactions in TM-AFM.
    Pishkenari HN; Meghdari A
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1423-36. PubMed ID: 21864786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contact atomic force microscopy using piezoresistive cantilevers in load force modulation mode.
    Biczysko P; Dzierka A; Jóźwiak G; Rudek M; Gotszalk T; Janus P; Grabiec P; Rangelow IW
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Jan; 184(Pt A):199-208. PubMed ID: 28950210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative determination of the interaction potential between two surfaces using frequency-modulated atomic force microscopy.
    Chan N; Lin C; Jacobs T; Carpick RW; Egberts P
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2020; 11():729-739. PubMed ID: 32461874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Euler-Bernoulli theory accurately predicts atomic force microscope cantilever shape during non-equilibrium snap-to-contact motion.
    Eppell SJ; Friedenberg D; Payton O; Picco L; Zypman FR
    Nanotechnology; 2020 May; 31(18):185702. PubMed ID: 31962307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In situ characterization of nanoscale contaminations adsorbed in air using atomic force microscopy.
    Lacasa JS; Almonte L; Colchero J
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2018; 9():2925-2935. PubMed ID: 30546989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of tip-sample interaction measurements using dynamic atomic force microscopy techniques: Dependence on oscillation amplitude, interaction strength, and tip-sample distance.
    Dagdeviren OE; Schwarz UD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Mar; 90(3):033707. PubMed ID: 30927822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method to quantitatively evaluate the Hamaker constant using the jump-into-contact effect in atomic force microscopy.
    Das S; Sreeram PA; Raychaudhuri AK
    Nanotechnology; 2007 Jan; 18(3):035501. PubMed ID: 19636120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical solutions of the first three frequency shifts of AFM non-uniform probe subjected to the Lennard-Jones force.
    Lin SM; Liauh CT; Wang WR; Ho SH
    Ultramicroscopy; 2006 Apr; 106(6):508-15. PubMed ID: 16564130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of in-contact probe-sample electrostatic forces with dynamic atomic force microscopy.
    Balke N; Jesse S; Carmichael B; Okatan MB; Kravchenko II; Kalinin SV; Tselev A
    Nanotechnology; 2017 Jan; 28(6):065704. PubMed ID: 28050969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of dynamic cantilever behavior in tapping mode atomic force microscopy.
    Deng W; Zhang GM; Murphy MF; Lilley F; Harvey DM; Burton DR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):935-46. PubMed ID: 26303510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterizing the free and surface-coupled vibrations of heated-tip atomic force microscope cantilevers.
    Killgore JP; Tung RC; Hurley DC
    Nanotechnology; 2014 Aug; 25(34):345701. PubMed ID: 25098183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical method to limit tip-sample contact stress and prevent wear in amplitude modulation atomic force microscopy.
    Vahdat V; Carpick RW
    ACS Nano; 2013 Nov; 7(11):9836-50. PubMed ID: 24131354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.