187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504222)
1. Characterization of Probe Dynamic Behaviors in Critical Dimension Atomic Force Microscopy.
Feng SC; Joung CB; Vorburger TV
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2009; 114(4):2-214. PubMed ID: 27504222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational models of a nano probe tip for static behaviors.
Feng SC; Vorburger TV; Joung CB; Dixson RG; Fu J; Ma L
Scanning; 2008; 30(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18200506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of simulated scanning of atomic-scale silicon surface by atomic force microscopy.
Lin ZC; Liu SC
Scanning; 2008; 30(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 18623105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resonance frequencies of AFM cantilevers in contact with a surface.
Verbiest GJ; Rost MJ
Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Dec; 171():70-76. PubMed ID: 27615394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analyzing the Effect of Capillary Force on Vibrational Performance of the Cantilever of an Atomic Force Microscope in Tapping Mode with Double Piezoelectric Layers in an Air Environment.
Nahavandi A; Korayem MH
Microsc Microanal; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1195-206. PubMed ID: 26324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate measurement of Atomic Force Microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration.
Slattery AD; Blanch AJ; Quinton JS; Gibson CT
Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Aug; 131():46-55. PubMed ID: 23685172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis the effect of different geometries of AFM's cantilever on the dynamic behavior and the critical forces of three-dimensional manipulation.
Korayem MH; Saraie MB; Saraee MB
Ultramicroscopy; 2017 Apr; 175():9-24. PubMed ID: 28110179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the tip mass on the tip-sample interactions in TM-AFM.
Pishkenari HN; Meghdari A
Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1423-36. PubMed ID: 21864786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact atomic force microscopy using piezoresistive cantilevers in load force modulation mode.
Biczysko P; Dzierka A; Jóźwiak G; Rudek M; Gotszalk T; Janus P; Grabiec P; Rangelow IW
Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Jan; 184(Pt A):199-208. PubMed ID: 28950210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative determination of the interaction potential between two surfaces using frequency-modulated atomic force microscopy.
Chan N; Lin C; Jacobs T; Carpick RW; Egberts P
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2020; 11():729-739. PubMed ID: 32461874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Euler-Bernoulli theory accurately predicts atomic force microscope cantilever shape during non-equilibrium snap-to-contact motion.
Eppell SJ; Friedenberg D; Payton O; Picco L; Zypman FR
Nanotechnology; 2020 May; 31(18):185702. PubMed ID: 31962307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ characterization of nanoscale contaminations adsorbed in air using atomic force microscopy.
Lacasa JS; Almonte L; Colchero J
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2018; 9():2925-2935. PubMed ID: 30546989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of tip-sample interaction measurements using dynamic atomic force microscopy techniques: Dependence on oscillation amplitude, interaction strength, and tip-sample distance.
Dagdeviren OE; Schwarz UD
Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Mar; 90(3):033707. PubMed ID: 30927822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to quantitatively evaluate the Hamaker constant using the jump-into-contact effect in atomic force microscopy.
Das S; Sreeram PA; Raychaudhuri AK
Nanotechnology; 2007 Jan; 18(3):035501. PubMed ID: 19636120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical solutions of the first three frequency shifts of AFM non-uniform probe subjected to the Lennard-Jones force.
Lin SM; Liauh CT; Wang WR; Ho SH
Ultramicroscopy; 2006 Apr; 106(6):508-15. PubMed ID: 16564130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of in-contact probe-sample electrostatic forces with dynamic atomic force microscopy.
Balke N; Jesse S; Carmichael B; Okatan MB; Kravchenko II; Kalinin SV; Tselev A
Nanotechnology; 2017 Jan; 28(6):065704. PubMed ID: 28050969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of dynamic cantilever behavior in tapping mode atomic force microscopy.
Deng W; Zhang GM; Murphy MF; Lilley F; Harvey DM; Burton DR
Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):935-46. PubMed ID: 26303510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing the free and surface-coupled vibrations of heated-tip atomic force microscope cantilevers.
Killgore JP; Tung RC; Hurley DC
Nanotechnology; 2014 Aug; 25(34):345701. PubMed ID: 25098183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical method to limit tip-sample contact stress and prevent wear in amplitude modulation atomic force microscopy.
Vahdat V; Carpick RW
ACS Nano; 2013 Nov; 7(11):9836-50. PubMed ID: 24131354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assessment of atomic force microscopy probes by scanning electron microscopy: correlation of tip structure with rendered images.
Taatjes DJ; Quinn AS; Lewis MR; Bovill EG
Microsc Res Tech; 1999 Mar; 44(5):312-26. PubMed ID: 10090206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
