These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504403)

  • 1. Comparison of K-loop Molar Distalization with that of Pendulum Appliance - A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Shashidhar NR; Reddy SR; Rachala MR
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jun; 10(6):ZC20-3. PubMed ID: 27504403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
    Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue profile after distal molar movement with a pendulum K-loop appliance versus cervical headgear.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Güngör-Acar A; Kircelli BH
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18251595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Pendulum appliance and the Jones Jig: A prospective comparative study.
    Shetty S; Maurya R; Raj HVP; Patil A
    Eur J Dent; 2017; 11(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 28932141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study.
    Serafin M; Fastuca R; Castellani E; Caprioglio A
    Turk J Orthod; 2021; 34(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 33828873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.
    Kırcalı M; Yüksel AS
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 31(4):103-109. PubMed ID: 30701219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances.
    Caprioglio A; Cafagna A; Fontana M; Cozzani M
    Korean J Orthod; 2015 Jul; 45(4):171-9. PubMed ID: 26258063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Cambiano AO; Janson G; Fuziy A; Garib DG; Lorenzoni DC
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):141-146. PubMed ID: 29119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances.
    Caprioglio A; Fontana M; Longoni E; Cozzani M
    Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 23075060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
    Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper airways changes associated with orthodontic molar distalization by Pendulum appliance in adolescent patients: a multicenter retrospective cephalometric study.
    Serafin M; Kinzinger G; Hourfar J; Mantellini V; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
    Head Face Med; 2024 Oct; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 39415201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer.
    Sodagar A; Ahmad Akhoundi MS; Rafighii A; Arab S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2011; 8(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 22457837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.