265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504905)
1. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification accuracy of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2)-Restructured form validity scales in detecting malingered pain-related disability.
Bianchini KJ; Aguerrevere LE; Curtis KL; Roebuck-Spencer TM; Frey FC; Greve KW; Calamia M
Psychol Assess; 2018 Jul; 30(7):857-869. PubMed ID: 29072481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the MMPI-2-RF and PAI overreporting indicators in a civil forensic sample with emphasis on the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS).
Tylicki JL; Rai JK; Arends P; Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS
Psychol Assess; 2021 Jan; 33(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 33090826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.
Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
Assessment; 2007 Jun; 14(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 17504891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the MMPI-2-RF for Detecting Over-reported Symptoms in a Civil Forensic and Disability Setting.
Nguyen CT; Green D; Barr WB
Clin Neuropsychol; 2015; 29(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 25905684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.
Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria.
Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M
Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot study on the Chinese Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in detecting feigned mental disorders: Simulators classified by using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
Chang YT; Tam WC; Shiah YJ; Chiang SK
Psych J; 2017 Sep; 6(3):175-184. PubMed ID: 28613018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associations between Symptom Validity Test failure and scores on the MMPI-2-RF validity and substantive scales.
Gervais RO; Wygant DB; Sellbom M; Ben-Porath YS
J Pers Assess; 2011; 93(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 21859291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A known-groups evaluation of the response bias scale in a neuropsychological setting.
Sullivan KA; Elliott CD; Lange RT; Anderson DS
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2013; 20(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 23373681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of the response bias scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance.
Whitney KA; Davis JJ; Shepard PH; Herman SM
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008; 23(7-8):777-86. PubMed ID: 18930375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of the MMPI-2 malingering discriminant function index in the detection of malingering: a study of criminal defendants.
Toomey JA; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Assessment; 2009 Mar; 16(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 18607009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting.
Delain SL; Stafford KP; Ben-Porath YS
Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 14682483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales to detect suspected malingering in a disability claimant sample.
Chmielewski M; Zhu J; Burchett D; Bury AS; Bagby RM
Psychol Assess; 2017 Feb; 29(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 27183046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints.
Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Sellbom M
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Jun; 25(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 20335183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of MMPI-2 validity scale scores of personal injury litigants and disability claimants.
Tsushima WT; Geling O; Fabrigas J
Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Nov; 25(8):1403-14. PubMed ID: 22003896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores generated from the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF test booklets: internal structure comparability in a sample of criminal defendants.
Tarescavage AM; Alosco ML; Ben-Porath YS; Wood A; Luna-Jones L
Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 24934218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
