265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504905)
21. Does True Neurocognitive Dysfunction Contribute to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2nd Edition-Restructured Form Cognitive Validity Scale Scores?
Martin PK; Schroeder RW; Heinrichs RJ; Baade LE
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2015 Aug; 30(5):377-86. PubMed ID: 26051870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examining the use of the M-FAST with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial.
Miller HA
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Jun; 48(3):268-80. PubMed ID: 15142307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Scores on the MMPI-2-RF scales as a function of increasing levels of failure on cognitive symptom validity tests in a military sample.
Jones A; Ingram MV; Ben-Porath YS
Clin Neuropsychol; 2012; 26(5):790-815. PubMed ID: 22709365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Further validation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale: findings from disability and criminal forensic settings.
Wygant DB; Sellbom M; Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Stafford KP; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
Psychol Assess; 2010 Dec; 22(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 20919770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried E; Glassmire D
Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. "Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria": Correction to Tylicki et al. (2018).
Psychol Assess; 2019 Jan; 31(1):14. PubMed ID: 30596448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory.
Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Duncan SA
Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 17154762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An investigation of the validity of the MMPI-2 response bias scale using an analog simulation design.
Sullivan KA; Elliott C
Clin Neuropsychol; 2012; 26(1):160-76. PubMed ID: 22263855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2.
Liu C; Liu Z; Chiu HF; Carl TW; Zhang H; Wang P; Wu G; Mwansisya TE; Cao L; Hu A; Wang Y; Xue Z
BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 24106829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample.
Fazio RL; Denning JH; Denney RL
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):251-267. PubMed ID: 27456971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An MMPI-2 scale to detect malingered depression (Md scale).
Steffan JS; Clopton JR; Morgan RD
Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):382-92. PubMed ID: 14682484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detecting feigned ADHD in college students using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF).
Morris NM; Lee TTC; Demakis GJ; Park S
Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Aug; 37(6):1154-1172. PubMed ID: 35980751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A validation of the test of memory malingering in a forensic psychiatric setting.
Weinborn M; Orr T; Woods SP; Conover E; Feix J
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Oct; 25(7):979-90. PubMed ID: 13680444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and Validation of the False Disorder Score: The Focal Scale of the Inventory of Problems.
Viglione DJ; Giromini L; Landis P; McCullaugh JM; Pizitz TD; O'Brien S; Wood S; Connell K; Abramsky A
J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(6):653-661. PubMed ID: 30388903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differential sensitivity of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and MMPI-2 validity scales to memory complaints.
Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1061-79. PubMed ID: 18609315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Normative data for the F(p) scale of the MMPI-2: implications for clinical and forensic assessment of malingering.
Rothke SE; Friedman AF; Jaffe AM; Greene RL; Wetter MW; Cole P; Baker K
Psychol Assess; 2000 Sep; 12(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 11021157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The detection of malingering in criminal forensic groups: MMPI validity scales.
Wasyliw OE; Grossman LS; Haywood TW; Cavanaugh JL
J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3404393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the MMPI-2 Response Bias Scale and Henry-Heilbronner Index in a U.S. veteran population.
Young JC; Kearns LA; Roper BL
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 21459900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relation between symptom validity testing and MMPI-2 scores as a function of forensic evaluation context.
Wygant DB; Sellbom M; Ben-Porath YS; Stafford KP; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 22(4):489-99. PubMed ID: 17350796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
