165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27504913)
1. Effectiveness of abdominal shields in chest radiography: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Matyagin YV; Collins PJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160465. PubMed ID: 27504913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Achievable dose reductions with gonadal shielding for children and adults during abdominal/pelvic radiographic examinations: A Monte Carlo simulation.
Somasundaram E; Brady SL; Strauss KJ
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5514-5522. PubMed ID: 32978986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EFFECT OF PELVIC LEAD SHIELD ON ORGAN DOSES IN POSTERO-ANTERIOR CHEST RADIOGRAPHY.
Kelaranta A; Mäkelä T; Hyppänen T; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Jan; 199(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 36347420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric evaluation of lead and tungsten eye shields in electron beam treatment.
Shiu AS; Tung SS; Gastorf RJ; Hogstrom KR; Morrison WH; Peters LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jun; 35(3):599-604. PubMed ID: 8655385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data.
Fricke BL; Donnelly LF; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Varchena V; Poe SA; Lucaya J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):407-11. PubMed ID: 12540443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of shielding on pelvic and abdominal IORT dose distributions.
Esposito A; Sakellaris T; Limede P; Costa F; Cunha LT; Dias AG; Lencart J; Sarmento S; Rosa CC
Phys Med; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 27780674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
Coursey C; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Greenberg SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W54-61. PubMed ID: 18094273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Breast dose reduction in female CT screening for lung cancer using various metallic shields].
Takada K; Kaneko J; Aoki K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Dec; 65(12):1628-37. PubMed ID: 20124740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations.
Yanch JC; Behrman RH; Hendricks MJ; McCall JH
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 19403846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of effects of nasal and facial shields on delivered radiation dose for superficial x-ray treatments.
Yu PK; Butson MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(5):N95-N102. PubMed ID: 23422253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans.
Dauer LT; Casciotta KA; Erdi YE; Rothenberg LN
BMC Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 7():5. PubMed ID: 17367529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Gonad protective effect of radiation protective apron in chest radiography].
Hashimoto M; Kato H; Fujibuchi T; Ochi S; Morita F
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1704-12. PubMed ID: 15614222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations.
Colombo P; Pedroli G; Nicoloso M; Re S; Valvassori L; Vanzulli A
Radiol Med; 2004; 108(5-6):560-8. PubMed ID: 15723002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18293563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA; Grams MP; Sturchio GM
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27941226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The additional dose to radiosensitive organs caused by using under-collimated X-ray beams in neonatal intensive care radiography.
Datz H; Ben-Shlomo A; Bader D; Sadetzki S; Juster-Reicher A; Marks K; Smolkin T; Zangen S; Margaliot M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 18375467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
