These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27505048)

  • 1. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; McKendrick R; Smith MA; McKnight PE; Krueger F; Parasuraman R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Sep; 22(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 27505048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meaningful Communication but not Superficial Anthropomorphism Facilitates Human-Automation Trust Calibration: The Human-Automation Trust Expectation Model (HATEM).
    Carter OBJ; Loft S; Visser TAW
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; ():187208231218156. PubMed ID: 38041565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.
    Pak R; Fink N; Price M; Bass B; Sturre L
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1059-72. PubMed ID: 22799560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.
    Cockram L; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104027. PubMed ID: 37100010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I trust it, but I don't know why: effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system.
    Merritt SM; Heimbaugh H; LaChapell J; Lee D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):520-34. PubMed ID: 23829027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The frequency of positive and negative interactions influences relationship equity and trust in automation.
    Sharp WH; Jackson KM; Shaw TH
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Apr; 108():103961. PubMed ID: 36640742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Anthropomorphic Cues on Patients' Perceived Anthropomorphism, Social Presence, Trust Building, and Acceptance of Health Care Conversational Agents: Within-Subject Web-Based Experiment.
    Li Q; Luximon Y; Zhang J
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e44479. PubMed ID: 37561567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the driver-automation interaction: an approach using automation uncertainty.
    Beller J; Heesen M; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1130-41. PubMed ID: 24745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: an evaluation of the nomological network.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK; Eschleman KJ; Alarcon GM; Barelka AJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Jun; 53(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 21830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural Correlates of Variations in Human Trust in Human-like Machines during Non-reciprocal Interactions.
    Jung ES; Dong SY; Lee SY
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9975. PubMed ID: 31292474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The (Im)perfect Automation Schema: Who Is Trusted More, Automated or Human Decision Support?
    Rieger T; Kugler L; Manzey D; Roesler E
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 37632728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. System-wide versus component-specific trust using multiple aids.
    Keller D; Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 20198819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings.
    Kaplan AD; Kessler TT; Brill JC; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):337-359. PubMed ID: 34048287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-level analysis of the effects of age and gender stereotypes on trust in anthropomorphic technology by younger and older adults.
    Pak R; McLaughlin AC; Bass B
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(9):1277-89. PubMed ID: 24935771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation.
    Lewandowsky S; Mundy M; Tan GP
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):104-23. PubMed ID: 10937315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.