92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2750513)
21. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: Influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing.
Kaiser MM; Wessel LM; Zachert G; Stratmann C; Eggert R; Gros N; Schulze-Hessing M; Kienast B; Rapp M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jul; 26(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 21345557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical assessment of composite versus metallic intramedullary nailing system in femoral shaft fractures: A finite element study.
Samiezadeh S; Tavakkoli Avval P; Fawaz Z; Bougherara H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 24951320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The medial femoral wall can play a more important role in unstable intertrochanteric fractures compared with lateral femoral wall: a biomechanical study.
Nie B; Chen X; Li J; Wu D; Liu Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 12(1):197. PubMed ID: 29282138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures: Submuscular Plating Compared With Intramedullary Nailing.
Sutphen SA; Mendoza JD; Mundy AC; Yang JG; Beebe AC; Samora WP; Klingele KE
Orthopedics; 2016 Nov; 39(6):353-358. PubMed ID: 27459140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical effects of different localization of the point of entry in femoral nailing.
Strand RM; Mølster AO; Engesaeter LB; Gjerdet NR; Orner T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 117(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9457333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment of femoral and tibial diaphyseal nonunions using reamed intramedullary nailing without bone graft.
Oh JK; Bae JH; Oh CW; Biswal S; Hur CR
Injury; 2008 Aug; 39(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 18579143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A single percutaneous injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 accelerates fracture repair.
Einhorn TA; Majeska RJ; Mohaideen A; Kagel EM; Bouxsein ML; Turek TJ; Wozney JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Aug; 85(8):1425-35. PubMed ID: 12925621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical evaluation of the helica femoral implant system using traditional and modified techniques.
Dosch M; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Weeren R; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 23980642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intramedullary pressure increase and increase in cortical temperature during reaming of the femoral medullary cavity: the effect of draining the medullary contents before reaming.
Mueller CA; Rahn BA
J Trauma; 2003 Sep; 55(3):495-503; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 14501893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone loss after locked intramedullary nailing. Computed tomography of the femur and tibia in 10 cases.
Bråten M; Nordby A; Terjesen T; Rossvoll I
Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Jun; 63(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 1609597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intramedullary nailing and pulmonary embolism: does unreamed nailing prevent embolization? An in vivo study in rabbits.
Heim D; Regazzoni P; Tsakiris DA; Aebi T; Schlegel U; Marbet GA; Perren SM
J Trauma; 1995 Jun; 38(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 7602632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cardiopulmonary response to reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur comparing traditional reaming with a one-step reamer-irrigator-aspirator reaming system: an experimental study in pigs.
Husebye EE; Lyberg T; Opdahl H; Laurvik H; Røise O
J Trauma; 2010 Oct; 69(4):E6-14. PubMed ID: 20489666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.
Linke B; Ansari Moein C; Bösl O; Verhofstad MH; van der Werken C; Schwieger K; Ito K
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):716-22. PubMed ID: 18978548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Effect of intramedullary reaming and nailing on the production of growth factors in the femur fracture callus in rats].
Mingo-Robinet J; Valle-Cruz JA; Ortega-Medina L; Fuentes-Ferrer M; López-Durán Stern L
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2013; 57(6):384-90. PubMed ID: 24071040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reamed versus minimally reamed nailing: a prospectively randomised study of 100 patients with closed fractures of the tibia.
Gaebler C; McQueen MM; Vécsei V; Court-Brown CM
Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 4():S17-21. PubMed ID: 21939798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reaming during anterograde femoral nailing: is it worth it?
Forster MC; Aster AS; Ahmed S
Injury; 2005 Mar; 36(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 15710164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurement of local strains induced into the femur by trochanteric Gamma nail implants with one or two distal screws.
Filardi V; Montanini R
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 16513407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison study between reamed and unreamed nailing of closed femoral fractures.
Selvakumar K; Saw KY; Fathima M
Med J Malaysia; 2001 Dec; 56 Suppl D():24-8. PubMed ID: 14569762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Femoral bone strains during antegrade nailing: a comparison of two entry points with identical nails using finite element analysis.
Tupis TM; Altman GT; Altman DT; Cook HA; Miller MC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 22137147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Muscle perfusion after intramedullary nailing of the canine tibia.
Hupel TM; Aksenov SA; Schemitsch EH
J Trauma; 1998 Aug; 45(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 9715181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
