288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27505226)
21. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
Mate J; Baqués J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.
Emrich SM; Ferber S
J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 22523399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors.
Hardman KO; Vergauwe E; Ricker TJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):30-54. PubMed ID: 27797548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Where to attend next: guiding refreshing of visual, spatial, and verbal representations in working memory.
Souza AS; Vergauwe E; Oberauer K
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 29683504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Memory for a single object has differently variable precisions for relevant and irrelevant features.
Swan G; Collins J; Wyble B
J Vis; 2016; 16(3):32. PubMed ID: 26913624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How is the serial order of a visual sequence represented? Insights from transposition latencies.
Hurlstone MJ; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):167-192. PubMed ID: 28910129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?
Allen RJ; Castellà J; Ueno T; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25030081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.
Cowan N; Blume CL; Saults JS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):731-47. PubMed ID: 22905929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dissociation between appearance and location within visuo-spatial working memory.
Darling S; Sala SD; Logie RH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 18728999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.
Nieuwenstein M; Wyble B
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 24364683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Blood glucose influences memory and attention in young adults.
Benton D; Owens DS; Parker PY
Neuropsychologia; 1994 May; 32(5):595-607. PubMed ID: 8084417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attribute amnesia reflects a lack of memory consolidation for attended information.
Chen H; Wyble B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26348066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.
Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Further studies on the role of attention and stimulus repetition in item-item binding processes in visual working memory.
Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30024264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Similarity-based clusters are representational units of visual working memory.
Son G; Oh BI; Kang MS; Chong SC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 31070398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
Kuo CY; Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
