BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27505466)

  • 1. Moral typecasting underlies punitive responses to crime.
    Miller AL; Borgida E
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 27505466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach.
    Silver JR; Silver E
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):258-272. PubMed ID: 28150974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.
    Gray K; Wegner DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):505-20. PubMed ID: 19254100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving the agency of harmful agents: A test of dehumanization versus moral typecasting accounts.
    Khamitov M; Rotman JD; Piazza J
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():33-47. PubMed ID: 26398862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.
    Laurent SM; Clark BA; Walker S; Wiseman KD
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 23725235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mind attributions about moral actors: intentionality is greater given coherent cues.
    Hughes JS; Trafimow D
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 24965741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moral hypervigilance: the influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain.
    Jones A; Fitness J
    Emotion; 2008 Oct; 8(5):613-27. PubMed ID: 18837611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral concerns, criminal punishment, and whether offenders in general or individual offenders are being considered.
    Brubacher MR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):129-147. PubMed ID: 30489126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic monitoring of offenders: an ethical review.
    Bülow W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):505-18. PubMed ID: 23975173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why we don't always punish: Preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations.
    Heffner J; FeldmanHall O
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13219. PubMed ID: 31519991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?
    Petersen TS
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jan; 44(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 28507223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in criminal thinking from midadolescence to early adulthood: Does trajectory direction matter?
    Walters GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):154-163. PubMed ID: 35084907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Internally Wicked": Investigating How and Why Essentialism Influences Punitiveness and Moral Condemnation.
    Martin JW; Heiphetz L
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12991. PubMed ID: 34170019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpersonal transgressions and psychological loss: Understanding moral repair as dyadic, reciprocal, and interactionist.
    Woodyatt L; Wenzel M; Okimoto TG; Thai M
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():7-11. PubMed ID: 34534843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive processing of moral and social judgements: a comparison of offenders, students, and control participants.
    Lahat A; Gummerum M; Mackay L; Hanoch Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 25026364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deconstructing moral character judgments.
    Hartman R; Blakey W; Gray K
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Feb; 43():205-212. PubMed ID: 34418790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of moral judgment and empathy in young sex offenders: a comparison of clinical judgment and test results.
    van Vugt E; Asscher J; Hendriks J; Stams GJ; Bijleveld C; van der Laan P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Oct; 56(7):986-96. PubMed ID: 21862524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice.
    Bastian B; Denson TF; Haslam N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61842. PubMed ID: 23626737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A person-centered approach to moral judgment.
    Uhlmann EL; Pizarro DA; Diermeier D
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25910382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
    Goodwin GP; Piazza J; Rozin P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):148-68. PubMed ID: 24274087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.