BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27505629)

  • 1. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.
    Fader AN; Seamon LG; Escobar PF; Frasure HE; Havrilesky LA; Zanotti KM; Secord AA; Boggess JF; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Skafianos G; Rossi E; Gehrig PA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22555102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical approaches in women with endometrial cancer with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m
    Raventós-Tato RM; de la Torre-Fernández de Vega J; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Díaz-Feijoó B; Sabadell J; Pérez-Benavente MA; Gil-Moreno A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jan; 45(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 30191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
    Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
    Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
    Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
    Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
    Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Venous thromboembolism following minimally invasive surgery among women with endometrial cancer.
    Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Littell RD; Garcia C; Conell C; Powell CB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Aug; 142(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 27264213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
    Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual docking robotic surgical staging for high risk endometrial cancer.
    Loaec C; Bats AS; Ngo C; Cornou C; Rossi L; Bensaid C; Nos C; Lecuru F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():79-83. PubMed ID: 29679815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
    Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Survival and Recurrence Outcomes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Versus Open Surgery.
    Park HK; Helenowski IB; Berry E; Lurain JR; Neubauer NL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 25922108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.