These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27505995)

  • 1. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Bansal R; Burgess J; Lawson NC
    Am J Dent; 2016 Jun; 29(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 27505995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Wear of Glass-Ionomer Containing Restorative Materials.
    Valeri AS; Sulaiman TA; Wright JT; Donovan TE
    Oper Dent; 2022 Nov; 47(6):678-685. PubMed ID: 36279318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demineralization Inhibition by Two Calcium-releasing Restorative Materials.
    Huang CT; Burgess JO; Robles A; Lawson NC
    Oper Dent; 2021 Nov; 46(6):680-689. PubMed ID: 35507898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear of an ion-releasing powder/liquid polymer resin in relation to that of glass-ionomer and conventional resin composites.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Peschke A
    Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):171-177. PubMed ID: 32794389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A; Feigal RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Support of occlusal enamel provided by bonded restorations.
    Grisanti LP; Troendle KB; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 14753332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Pameijer CH; Garcia-Godoy F; Morrow BR; Jefferies SR
    J Clin Dent; 2015; 26(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 26054188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite.
    Carvalho FG; Sampaio CS; Fucio SB; Carlo HL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 22433031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear.
    Daabash R; Alshabib A; Alqahtani MQ; Price RB; Silikas N; Alshaafi MM
    Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1866-1877. PubMed ID: 36202659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel high-wear-resistant glass-ionomer cement for class I and class II restorations.
    Zhao J; Weng Y; Xie D
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Feb; 117(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 19196323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repairability of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Shaffer RA; Charlton DG; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(4):168-72. PubMed ID: 9760918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.