These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2750650)
21. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy. Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway. Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Low-energy transvenous cardioversion defibrillation of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the canine: an assessment of electrode configurations and monophasic pulse sequencing. Benditt DG; Dunbar D; Fetter J; Sakaguchi S; Lurie KG; Adler SW Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):994-1003. PubMed ID: 8160604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveforms in epicardial atrial defibrillation. Keane D; Boyd E; Anderson D; Robles A; Deverall P; Morris R; Jackson G; Sowton E J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 8006262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway--the tongue-epigastric route. I. Experimental studies in dogs. Kerber RE; Hoyt R; Aronson A; Kieso R; Melton J J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):966-72. PubMed ID: 6630773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Defibrillation electrode configurations developed from cardiac mapping that combine biphasic shocks with sequential timing. Guse PA; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Am Heart J; 1992 Dec; 124(6):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1462904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms. Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sequential pulse defibrillation for implantable defibrillators. Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Wessale JL; Kallok MJ; Graf JE; Geddes LA Med Instrum; 1986; 20(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3724587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of phase separation on biphasic waveform defibrillation. Cooper RA; Wallenius ST; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Mar; 16(3 Pt 1):471-82. PubMed ID: 7681199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation. Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system. Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation. Jung W; Manz M; Moosdorf R; Spehl S; Wolpert C; Korte T; Lüderitz B Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ascending-ramp biphasic waveform has a lower defibrillation threshold and releases less troponin I than a truncated exponential biphasic waveform. Huang J; Walcott GP; Ruse RB; Bohanan SJ; Killingsworth CR; Ideker RE Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(11):1328-33. PubMed ID: 22865891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biphasic versus sequential pulse defibrillation: a direct comparison in humans. Jones DL; Klein GJ; Guiraudon GM; Yee R Am Heart J; 1993 Feb; 125(2 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 8427134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch. Alt EU; Fotuhi PC; Callihan RL; Rollins DL; Mestre E; Combs MP; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 7805249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms. Kavanagh KM; Tang AS; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 14(5):1343-9. PubMed ID: 2808992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements. Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Goyal R; Chan KK; Bogun F; Castellani M; Harvey M; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Man KC; Morady F Am Heart J; 1996 May; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]