BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27507771)

  • 1. A simple scoring system to assess the need for an endoscopic intervention in suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Horibe M; Kaneko T; Yokogawa N; Yokota T; Okawa O; Nakatani Y; Ogura Y; Matsuzaki J; Iwasaki E; Hosoe N; Masaoka T; Inadomi JM; Suzuki H; Kanai T; Namiki S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1180-6. PubMed ID: 27507771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simplified clinical risk score predicts the need for early endoscopy in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Tammaro L; Buda A; Di Paolo MC; Zullo A; Hassan C; Riccio E; Vassallo R; Caserta L; Anderloni A; Natali A; ;
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Sep; 46(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 24953205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Horibe GI bleeding prediction score: a simple score for triage decision-making in patients with suspected upper GI bleeding.
    Horibe M; Iwasaki E; Bazerbachi F; Kaneko T; Matsuzaki J; Minami K; Masaoka T; Hosoe N; Ogura Y; Namiki S; Hosoda Y; Ogata H; Chan AT; Kanai T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Sep; 92(3):578-588.e4. PubMed ID: 32240682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Quach DT; Dao NH; Dinh MC; Nguyen CH; Ho LX; Nguyen ND; Le QD; Vo CM; Le SK; Hiyama T
    Gut Liver; 2016 May; 10(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 26601829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.
    Chandra S; Hess EP; Agarwal D; Nestler DM; Montori VM; Song LM; Wells GA; Stiell IG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 30(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 21641145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel scoring system to predict therapeutic intervention for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ito N; Funasaka K; Furukawa K; Kakushima N; Hirose T; Muroi K; Suzuki T; Suzuki T; Hida E; Ishikawa T; Yamamura T; Ohno E; Nakamura M; Kawashima H; Miyahara R; Fujishiro M
    Intern Emerg Med; 2022 Mar; 17(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 34363550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.