These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27507946)

  • 1. Relationship between Age and the Ability to Break Scored Tablets.
    Notenboom K; Vromans H; Schipper M; Leufkens HG; Bouvy ML
    Front Pharmacol; 2016; 7():222. PubMed ID: 27507946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tablet-breaking ability of older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Wilson MG; Kaiser FE; Morley JE
    Diabetes Educ; 2001; 27(4):530-40. PubMed ID: 12212341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breaking of scored tablets: a review.
    van Santen E; Barends DM; Frijlink HW
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2002 Mar; 53(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 11879995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bending strength of tablets with a breaking line--Comparison of the results of an elastic and a "brittle cracking" finite element model with experimental findings.
    Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Nov; 495(1):485-499. PubMed ID: 26363109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy, precision and sustainability of different techniques for tablet subdivision: breaking by hand and the use of tablet splitters or a kitchen knife.
    van Riet-Nales DA; Doeve ME; Nicia AE; Teerenstra S; Notenboom K; Hekster YA; van den Bemt BJ
    Int J Pharm; 2014 May; 466(1-2):44-51. PubMed ID: 24561329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The scored tablet--a source of error in drug dosing?
    Stimpel M; Vetter H; Küffer B; Groth H; Greminger P; Vetter W
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1985 Apr; 3(1):S97-9. PubMed ID: 3870476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical investigations into the influence of the position of a breaking line on the tensile failure of flat, round, bevel-edged tablets using finite element methodology (FEM) and its practical relevance for industrial tablet strength testing.
    Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
    Int J Pharm; 2014 Dec; 477(1-2):306-16. PubMed ID: 25455775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of a test battery to assess the hand-eye functions relevant in predicting easy and accurate tablet subdivision in older people: A pilot study.
    van Riet-Nales D; Donkerbroek L; Nicia A; Oussoren C; de Boer A; van den Bemt B
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 86(10):1969-1981. PubMed ID: 31875976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical analysis of tablet breakability methods.
    Van Vooren L; De Spiegeleer B; Thonissen T; Joye P; Van Durme J; Slegers G
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2002; 5(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 12207873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of an in vivo test procedure for the ease of breaking of scored tablets.
    Barends DM; Groot DW; Frijlink HW; Rodenhuis N; van der Steen JC
    Pharmeur Sci Notes; 2005 Aug; 2005(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17687891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of tablet splitting and liquid measurements: an examination of who, what and how.
    Abu-Geras D; Hadziomerovic D; Leau A; Khan RN; Gudka S; Locher C; Razaghikashani M; Lim LY
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2017 May; 69(5):603-612. PubMed ID: 28028813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Newly Designed and Traditional Punches in Manufacturing of Scored ODTs.
    Palugan L; Moutaharrik S; Maroni A; Foppoli AA; Melocchi A; Vecchio C; Gazzaniga A; Cerea M
    Pharmaceutics; 2022 Sep; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36297490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient experiences with the performance of tablet score lines needed for dosing.
    Rodenhuis N; de Smet PA; Barends DM
    Pharm World Sci; 2003 Aug; 25(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 12964497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Tablet splitting].
    Quinzler R; Haefeli WE
    Ther Umsch; 2006 Jun; 63(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 16841582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New instrumentation for determining flexure breaking strength of capsule-shaped tablets.
    Gold G; Duvall RN; Palermo BT
    J Pharm Sci; 1980 Apr; 69(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 7373529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose Uniformity of Scored and Unscored Tablets: Application of the FDA Tablet Scoring Guidance for Industry.
    Ciavarella AB; Khan MA; Gupta A; Faustino PJ
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2016 11/12; 70(6):523-532. PubMed ID: 27974592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Problems of geriatric patients with managing drug containers].
    Nikolaus T; Bach M; Oster P; Schlierf G
    Z Gerontol Geriatr; 1995; 28(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 8581760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of breaking tests for the characterization of the interfacial strength of bilayer tablets.
    Castrati L; Mazel V; Busignies V; Diarra H; Rossi A; Colombo P; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27717917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key Technical Aspects Influencing the Accuracy of Tablet Subdivision.
    Teixeira MT; Sá-Barreto LCL; Gratieri T; Gelfuso GM; Silva ICR; Cunha-Filho MSS
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2017 May; 18(4):1393-1401. PubMed ID: 27586963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent trends in tablet subdivision and factors affecting subdivision in South Korea: A cross-sectional study.
    Son KB
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(18):e19990. PubMed ID: 32358374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.