These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2750796)

  • 1. Court-ordered cesarean section: an analysis of ethical concerns in compelling cases.
    Elkins TE; Andersen HF; Barclay M; Mason T; Bowdler N; Anderson G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 2750796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Elkins TE; Brown D; Barclay M; Andersen HF
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 2131088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section.
    Mahowald M
    Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 11649241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary.
    Brenner B; Burnet P
    N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The case for a middle ground.
    Elkins TE
    Womens Health Issues; 1990; 1(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 2136300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Re A.C.--an affirmation of ACOG Committee Opinion Number 55: maternal-fetal conflict.
    Allen AE
    Womens Health Issues; 1990; 1(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2136301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current controversies in obstetrics: wrongful life and forced fetal surgical procedures.
    Engelhardt HT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 151(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 3970098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
    Atl Report; 1987 Nov; 533():611-7. PubMed ID: 11648174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When caesarean section operations imposed by a court are justified.
    Kluge EH
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Dec; 14(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 3236350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
    Phelan JP
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
    Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.