139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2750828)
1. Primary stress urinary incontinence and pelvic relaxation: prospective randomized comparison of three different operations.
Bergman A; Koonings PP; Ballard CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2750828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized study.
Bergman A; Ballard CA; Koonings PP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 1):1102-6. PubMed ID: 2729386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study.
Bergman A; Elia G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 173(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 7631729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of burch retropubic urethropexy and anterior colporrhaphy for stress urinary incontinence.
Kammerer-Doak DN; Dorin MH; Rogers RG; Cousin MO
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 93(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 9916960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized comparison of two operative methods.
Liapis A; Pyrgiotis E; Kontoravdis A; Louridas C; Zourlas PA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Jan; 64(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 8801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for failed retropubic surgical procedure.
Koonings PP; Bergman A; Ballard CA
Urology; 1990 Sep; 36(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 2392816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of anterior colporrhaphy and retropubic urethropexy for patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence.
Harris RL; Yancey CA; Wiser WL; Morrison JC; Meeks GR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1671-4; discussion 1674-5. PubMed ID: 8610743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Postoperative evaluation of different surgical procedures in genuine stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective study].
Rodríguez-Colorado S; Pérez-Soriano P; Alvarez-Mercado RL; Herbert A; Kunhardt-Rasch J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1996 Jun; 64():251-5. PubMed ID: 8754724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of urethral electromyography in predicting outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy.
Kenton K; FitzGerald MP; Shott S; Brubaker L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 11483903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Needle suspension procedures for urinary stress incontinence: a review and historical perspective.
Cornella JL; Ostergard DR
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1990 Dec; 45(12):805-16. PubMed ID: 2270155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women.
Bergman A; Koonings PP; Ballard CA
J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 2724231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the modified Pereyra procedure using permanent suture material and Burch urethropexy.
Jongen VH; Brouwer WK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1999 May; 84(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10413219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified Burch versus Pereyra retropubic urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence.
Bhatia NN; Bergman A
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 4040618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of bladder neck suspension using Raz, Burch and transvaginal Burch procedures. A 3-year randomized prospective study.
Gilja I; Puskar D; Mazuran B; Radej M
Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 9555556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modifications of the urethral rest and stress profiles after different types of surgery for urinary stress incontinence.
Weil A; Reyes H; Bischoff P; Rottenberg RD; Krauer F
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Jan; 91(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 6537885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD002912. PubMed ID: 12535443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence: how does it work?
Klutke JJ; Klutke CG; Bergman J; Elia G
Neurourol Urodyn; 1999; 18(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 10529710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior vaginal repair and Burch colposuspension.
van Geelen JM; Theeuwes AG; Eskes TK; Martin CB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 3394733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. The Continence Program for Women Research Group.
Bump RC; Hurt WG; Theofrastous JP; Addison WA; Fantl JA; Wyman JF; McClish DK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):326-33; discussion 333-5. PubMed ID: 8765249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Urodynamics changes in voiding after anti-incontinence surgery: an insight into the mechanism of cure.
Klutke JJ; Klutke CG; Bergman J; Elia G
Urology; 1999 Dec; 54(6):1003-7. PubMed ID: 10604698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
