These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27508519)

  • 1. A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making.
    Cardoso RL; Leite RO; de Aquino AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160443. PubMed ID: 27508519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human factors of the confirmation bias in intelligence analysis: decision support from graphical evidence landscapes.
    Cook MB; Smallman HS
    Hum Factors; 2008 Oct; 50(5):745-54. PubMed ID: 19110834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
    Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC
    Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The independent and moderating role of choice of non-financial reporting format on forecast accuracy and ESG disclosure.
    Rossi P; Candio P
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118891. PubMed ID: 37659364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Helping consumers to evaluate annual percentage rates (APR) on credit cards.
    Chin A; Bruine de Bruin W
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 30475023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slope Identification and Decision Making: A Comparison of Linear and Ratio Graphs.
    Kubina RM; King SA; Halkowski M; Quigley S; Kettering T
    Behav Modif; 2023 May; 47(3):615-643. PubMed ID: 36373492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neuropsychological investigation of decisional certainty.
    Scherer AM; Taber-Thomas BC; Tranel D
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():206-13. PubMed ID: 25725416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the health care business model: the financial analysts' point of view.
    Bukh PN; Nielsen C
    J Health Care Finance; 2010; 37(2):8-26. PubMed ID: 21294436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical versus graphical aids for decision-making in a multi-cue signal identification task.
    Szulc J; Fletcher K
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jul; 118():104260. PubMed ID: 38417229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When theory and practice diverge: gender-related patterns of referral to psychoanalysts.
    Mayer EL; de Marneffe D
    J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 1992; 40(2):551-85. PubMed ID: 1593085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-awareness for financial decision-making abilities in healthy adults.
    Sunderaraman P; Chapman S; Barker MS; Cosentino S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235558. PubMed ID: 32614887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Information disclosure and decision making preferences of patients with advanced cancer in a Pain and Palliative Care Unit in Chile].
    Palma A; Cartes F; González M; Villarroel L; Parsons HA; Yennurajalingam S; Bruera E
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 24861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Psychology and Neuroscience of Financial Decision Making.
    Frydman C; Camerer CF
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 20(9):661-675. PubMed ID: 27499348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making for risk management: a comparison of graphical methods for presenting quantitative uncertainty.
    Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Allen PM; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2055-70. PubMed ID: 22616656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a Model of Analysts' Judgments to Augment an Item Calibration Process.
    Hauser C; Thum YM; He W; Ma L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):826-849. PubMed ID: 29795843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AN EMPIRICAL METHOD FOR MATERIALITY: WOULD CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES CHANGE PATIENT DECISIONS?
    Spece R; Yokum D; Okoro AG; Robertson Christopher
    Am J Law Med; 2014; 40(4):253-74. PubMed ID: 27530047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Cognitive Biases and Financial Factors on Forecast Accuracy of Analysts.
    Nardi PCC; Ribeiro EMS; Bueno JLO; Aggarwal I
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():773894. PubMed ID: 35058844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences in performance awareness on a complex financial decision-making task.
    Hershey DA; Wilson JA
    Exp Aging Res; 1997; 23(3):257-73. PubMed ID: 9248819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence and Information Access in Clinical Decision-Making: An Examination of the Cognitive Processes that affect the Information-seeking Behavior of Physicians.
    Uy RC; Sarmiento RF; Gavino A; Fontelo P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1134-40. PubMed ID: 25954424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.