221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27508935)
1. Objective assessment of compliance with intra- and extraoral removable appliances.
Arreghini A; Trigila S; Lombardo L; Siciliani G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 27508935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques.
McSherry PF; Bradley H
J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11099554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study.
Tsomos G; Ludwig B; Grossen J; Pazera P; Gkantidis N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23834273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acceptability and attractiveness of intra- and extra-oral orthodontic appliances.
Abu Alhaija ES; Karajeh MA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 23729132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase.
Schott TC; Schlipf C; Glasl B; Schwarzer CL; Weber J; Ludwig B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 24075661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of objective wear time between monoblock and twin-block appliances measured by microsensor.
Kutay C; Kılıçoğlu H; Sayar G
Angle Orthod; 2021 Nov; 91(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 34319376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased BMI in children-an indicator for less compliance during orthodontic treatment with removable appliances.
von Bremen J; Lorenz N; Ludwig B; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):350-355. PubMed ID: 29471384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
Wiedel AP
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Nahajowski M; Lis J; Sarul M
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic?
Creekmore TD; Radney LJ
Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):89-108. PubMed ID: 6572043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Distal movement without headgear: the use of an upper removable appliance for the retraction of upper first molars.
Lewis DH; Fox NA
Br J Orthod; 1996 Nov; 23(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 8985566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Edgewise arch. Mechanics for the treatment of Angle class I, II, and III].
Lopez Otero R; Luis Dotto A; Finguer GA; Cortes J; Breuer J
Ortodoncia; 1981 Nov-1982 May; 45-46(90-91):37-100. PubMed ID: 6963626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking functional appliances.
Feldman A; Zeit G
Ont Dent; 1994 Nov; 71(9):16-8, 20-4. PubMed ID: 9468957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances.
Schott TC; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Mayer N; Weber J; Weimer K
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27030283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early treatment protocol for skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Oltramari-Navarro PV; de Almeida RR; Conti AC; Navarro Rde L; de Almeida MR; Fernandes LS
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 23780363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A statistical study of the effect of a chincap combined with a maxillary protraction appliance to a case of reversed occlusion].
Ishii H; Matsubara S; Kitano T; Morita S; Ogasawara J; Sato M
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 44(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 3866813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances.
Shah N
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 29269817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bass orthopedic appliance system. Part 2. Diagnosis and appliance prescription.
Bass NM
J Clin Orthod; 1987 May; 21(5):312-20. PubMed ID: 3473071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of pain and discomfort during early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Removable Mandibular Retractor Appliance.
Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 23758461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
