185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27509940)
1. Surveillance Evaluation of the National Cancer Registry in Sabah, Malaysia.
Jeffree SM; Mihat O; Lukman KA; Ibrahim MY; Kamaludin F; Hassan MR; Kaur N; Myint T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3123-9. PubMed ID: 27509940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance.
Zanetti R; Schmidtmann I; Sacchetto L; Binder-Foucard F; Bordoni A; Coza D; Ferretti S; Galceran J; Gavin A; Larranaga N; Robinson D; Tryggvadottir L; Van Eycken E; Zadnik V; Coebergh JW; Rosso S
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1091-8. PubMed ID: 24393522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the maternal mortality surveillance system in Mutare district, Zimbabwe, 2014-2015: a cross sectional study.
Mutsigiri-Murewanhema F; Mafaune PT; Juru T; Gombe NT; Bangure D; Mungati M; Tshimanga M
Pan Afr Med J; 2017; 27():204. PubMed ID: 28904729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data Quality at the Indiana State Cancer Registry: An Evaluation of Timeliness by Cancer Type and Year.
Jabour AM; Dixon BE; Jones JF; Haggstrom DA
J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 29595919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance.
Thacker SB; Parrish RG; Trowbridge FL
World Health Stat Q; 1988; 41(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 3269210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Delhi Population Based Cancer Registry and Trends of Tobacco Related Cancers.
Yadav R; Garg R; Manoharan N; Swasticharan L; Julka P; Rath G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(6):2841-6. PubMed ID: 27356699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How well do birth records serve maternal and child health programs? Birth registration system evaluation, New York City, 2008-2011.
Howland RE; Madsen AM; Toprani A; Gambatese M; Mulready-Ward C; Begier E
Matern Child Health J; 2015 Jul; 19(7):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25604629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the German surveillance system for hepatitis B regarding timeliness, data quality, and simplicity, from 2005 to 2014.
Boes L; Houareau C; Altmann D; An der Heiden M; Bremer V; Diercke M; Dudareva S; Neumeyer-Gromen A; Zimmermann R
Public Health; 2020 Mar; 180():141-148. PubMed ID: 31918048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated selection of relevant information for notification of incident cancer cases within a multisource cancer registry.
Jouhet V; Defossez G; ; ; Ingrand P
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 23615926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data Reliability and Coding Completeness of Cancer Registry Information Using Reabstracting Method in the National Cancer Institute: Thailand, 2012 to 2014.
Sirirungreung A; Buasom R; Jiraphongsa C; Sangrajrang S
J Glob Oncol; 2018 Sep; 4():1-9. PubMed ID: 30241269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The completeness and timeliness of cancer registration and the implications for measuring cancer burden.
Donnelly C; Cairnduff V; Chen JJ; Kearney T; Fitzpatrick D; Fox C; Gavin A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():101-107. PubMed ID: 28600946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems.
Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Assessment of the Completeness and Timeliness of the Israel National Cancer Registry.
Moore E; Silverman BG; Fishler Y; Ben-Adiva E; Davidov O; Dichtiar R; Edri H; Zatlawi M; Keinan-Boker L
Isr Med Assoc J; 2021 Jan; 23(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 33443338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive meningococcal disease: completeness and timeliness of reporting of confirmed cases in Thames Valley, 2006-2007.
Paranthaman K; Kent L; McCarthy N; Gray SJ
Public Health; 2009 Dec; 123(12):805-8. PubMed ID: 19958917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Innovative Approach to Improve Completeness of Treatment and Other Key Data Elements in a Population-Based Cancer Registry: A15-Month Data Submission.
Hsieh MC; Mumphrey B; Pareti L; Yi Y; Wu XC
J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 29611688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Australian CJD surveillance system.
Robotin M
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep; 2002; 26(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 12206381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The South African National Non-Natural Mortality Surveillance System--rationale, pilot results and evaluation.
Butchart A; Peden M; Matzopoulos R; Phillips R; Burrows S; Bhagwandin N; Saayman G; Cooper A
S Afr Med J; 2001 May; 91(5):408-17. PubMed ID: 11455806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - United States, 2010-2011.
Mehta P; Antao V; Kaye W; Sanchez M; Williamson D; Bryan L; Muravov O; Horton K; ;
MMWR Suppl; 2014 Jul; 63(7):1-14. PubMed ID: 25054277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with time to availability for cases reported to population-based cancer registries.
Smith-Gagen J; Cress RD; Drake CM; Felter MC; Beaumont JJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2005 May; 16(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15953987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of data quality at the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine.
Ryzhov A; Bray F; Ferlay J; Fedorenko Z; Goulak L; Gorokh Y; Soumkina O; Znaor A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 53():156-165. PubMed ID: 29459256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
