181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27510370)
1. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.
Xu C; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2134-2161. PubMed ID: 36964996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction.
Demidenko E
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 17634969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal false discovery rate control for likelihood-based penalized regression models.
Miller RE; Breheny P
Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 30742712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test procedure and sample size determination for a proportion study using a double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
Qiu SF; Zeng XS; Tang ML; Poon WY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1019-1043. PubMed ID: 29233082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Logistic Regression Procedure in Small Samples.
Lee S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 29881077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.
Heinze G; Schemper M
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2409-19. PubMed ID: 12210625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New robust statistical procedures for the polytomous logistic regression models.
Castilla E; Ghosh A; Martin N; Pardo L
Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1282-1291. PubMed ID: 29772052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A screening-testing approach for detecting gene-environment interactions using sequential penalized and unpenalized multiple logistic regression.
Frost HR; Andrew AS; Karagas MR; Moore JH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():183-94. PubMed ID: 25592580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum penalized likelihood estimation in semiparametric mark-recapture-recovery models.
Michelot T; Langrock R; Kneib T; King R
Biom J; 2016 Jan; 58(1):222-39. PubMed ID: 26289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence intervals after multiple imputation: combining profile likelihood information from logistic regressions.
Heinze G; Ploner M; Beyea J
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5062-76. PubMed ID: 23873477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
Kojima M
Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence intervals for the mean of lognormal data with excess zeros.
Tian L; Wu J
Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 16544820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.
Heinze G
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4216-26. PubMed ID: 16955543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
