These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27510546)

  • 1. Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.
    Wang C; Nguyen PH; Pham K; Huynh D; Le TB; Wang H; Ren P; Luo R
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Oct; 37(27):2436-46. PubMed ID: 27510546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
    Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heterogeneous Dielectric Implicit Membrane Model for the Calculation of MMPBSA Binding Free Energies.
    Greene D; Qi R; Nguyen R; Qiu T; Luo R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):3041-3056. PubMed ID: 31145610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. g_mmpbsa--a GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations.
    Kumari R; Kumar R; ; Lynn A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1951-62. PubMed ID: 24850022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.
    Eken Y; Almeida NMS; Wang C; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 33150463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.
    Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate, robust, and reliable calculations of Poisson-Boltzmann binding energies.
    Nguyen DD; Wang B; Wei GW
    J Comput Chem; 2017 May; 38(13):941-948. PubMed ID: 28211071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B.
    Ciancetta A; Genheden S; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Aug; 25(8):729-42. PubMed ID: 21701919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy comparison of several common implicit solvent models and their implementations in the context of protein-ligand binding.
    Katkova EV; Onufriev AV; Aguilar B; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Mar; 72():70-80. PubMed ID: 28064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binding mode prediction and MD/MMPBSA-based free energy ranking for agonists of REV-ERBα/NCoR.
    Westermaier Y; Ruiz-Carmona S; Theret I; Perron-Sierra F; Poissonnet G; Dacquet C; Boutin JA; Ducrot P; Barril X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):755-775. PubMed ID: 28712038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.
    Rocklin GJ; Mobley DL; Dill KA; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(18):184103. PubMed ID: 24320250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.
    Izadi S; Aguilar B; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4450-9. PubMed ID: 26575935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Parameters for Higher Accuracy in the Computation of Binding Free Energy Differences upon Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Simões IC; Costa IP; Coimbra JT; Ramos MJ; Fernandes PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 27936711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trypsin-ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential.
    Jiao D; Zhang J; Duke RE; Li G; Schnieders MJ; Ren P
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Aug; 30(11):1701-11. PubMed ID: 19399779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent in molecular dynamics.
    Wang J; Tan C; Chanco E; Luo R
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Feb; 12(5):1194-202. PubMed ID: 20094685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
    Wang J; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.