These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27512088)

  • 1. Intraindividual Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Metallic Stents.
    Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Wiebe J; Colleran R; Giacoppo D; Harada Y; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Kastrati A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27512088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Cassese S; Byrne RA; Ndrepepa G; Kufner S; Wiebe J; Repp J; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Kimura T; Kastrati A
    Lancet; 2016 Feb; 387(10018):537-544. PubMed ID: 26597771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Montone RA; Niccoli G; De Marco F; Minelli S; D'Ascenzo F; Testa L; Bedogni F; Crea F
    Circulation; 2017 May; 135(22):2145-2154. PubMed ID: 28559495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.
    Alfonso F; Cuesta J; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; García Del Blanco B; Rumoroso JR; Bosa F; Pérez de Prado A; Masotti M; Moreno R; Cequier A; Gutiérrez H; García Touchard A; López-Mínguez JR; Zueco J; Martí V; Velázquez M; Morís C; Bastante T; García-Guimaraes M; Rivero F; Fernández C;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1841-1851. PubMed ID: 28866036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Mahmoud AN; Barakat AF; Elgendy AY; Schneibel E; Mentias A; Abuzaid A; Elgendy IY
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28468954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
    Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents.
    Sorrentino S; Giustino G; Mehran R; Kini AS; Sharma SK; Faggioni M; Farhan S; Vogel B; Indolfi C; Dangas GD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 69(25):3055-3066. PubMed ID: 28412389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.
    Jabbour RJ; Ielasi A; Tanaka A; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Grigis G; Mitomo S; Regazzoli D; Di Palma G; Rapetto C; Tespili M; Colombo A; Latib A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 28314675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents assessed at 1-year follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies.
    Mukete BN; van der Heijden LC; Tandjung K; Baydoun H; Yadav K; Saleh QA; Doggen CJ; Abi Rafeh N; Le Jemtel TH; von Birgelen C
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():1087-94. PubMed ID: 27448538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.
    Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Comparison With Short-Term Follow-Up of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Cortese B; Ielasi A; Romagnoli E; Varricchio A; Cuculo A; Loi B; Pisano F; Corrado D; Sesana M; La Vecchia L; Summaria F; Tespili M; Silva Orrego P; Tognoni G; Steffenino G
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 116(5):705-10. PubMed ID: 26100584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Barioli A; Paradies V; Vlachojannis G; Tellaroli P; Cortese B; di Palma G; Varricchio A; Ielasi A; Loi B; Steffenino G; Ueshima D; Mojoli M; Smits P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):E115-E124. PubMed ID: 29513403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to non BVS drug eluting stent in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) - A comparative study.
    Chakraborty R; Patra S; Banerjee S; Pande A; Khan A; Mandol PC; Ghosh D; De SK; Das SS; Nag R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 26905052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.
    Onuma Y; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Webster M; Nieman K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24156961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design.
    Diletti R; Serruys PW; Farooq V; Sudhir K; Dorange C; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Chevalier B
    Am Heart J; 2012 Nov; 164(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 23137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.
    Gao R; Yang Y; Han Y; Huo Y; Chen J; Yu B; Su X; Li L; Kuo HC; Ying SW; Cheong WF; Zhang Y; Su X; Xu B; Popma JJ; Stone GW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2298-2309. PubMed ID: 26471805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials.
    Alfonso F; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; García Del Blanco B; García-Touchard A; López-Mínguez JR; Masotti M; Zueco J; Melgares R; Mainar V; Moreno R; Domínguez A; Sanchís J; Bethencourt A; Moreu J; Cequier A; Martí V; Otaegui I; Bastante T; Gonzalo N; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Cárdenas A; Fernández C;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27412868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.