These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2751210)

  • 21. The effects of digital filtering on feline auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Zaaroor M; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 1720734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Power spectrum and optimal filtering for visual evoked potentials to pattern reversal.
    Skuse NF; Burke D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 1691972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.
    Shaw NA
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of analog and digital filtering on auditory middle latency responses in adults and young children.
    Suzuki T; Hirabayashi M; Kobayashi K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(3 Pt 1):267-70. PubMed ID: 6732112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rate and filter effects on the developing middle-latency response.
    Kraus N; Smith DI; McGee T
    Audiology; 1987; 26(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 3675310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AAEM minimonograph #39: digital filtering: basic concepts and application to evoked potentials.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Aug; 15(8):865-75. PubMed ID: 1495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of methods for reducing residual noise in suprathreshold early auditory evoked potential registration].
    Mühler R; von Specht H; Pethe J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jul; 77(7):382-7. PubMed ID: 9743976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of finite impulse response digital filters to auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Urbach D; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 64(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 2427321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of some nonrecursive digital filters for signals of auditory evoked responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M; Johansson R
    Biol Cybern; 1992; 66(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1586677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A simple algorithm for a digital three-pole Butterworth filter of arbitrary cut-off frequency: application to digital electroencephalography.
    Alarcon G; Guy CN; Binnie CD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Dec; 104(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11163409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of high-pass filter on auditory brain stem responses to tone pips.
    Suzuki T; Horiuchi K
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 929088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of digital filtering and automatic peak detection to brain stem auditory evoked potential.
    Fridman J; John ER; Bergelson M; Kaiser JB; Baird HW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 6175502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analog and digital filtering of ABR: ipsi- and contralateral derivations.
    Lettrem I; Laukli E
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 8654905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).
    Møller AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 2451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.