These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2751210)

  • 41. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a comparison of two high-frequency filter settings.
    Cacace AT; Shy M; Satya-Murti S
    Neurology; 1980 Jul; 30(7 Pt 1):765-7. PubMed ID: 7190242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of different high-pass filters on the long-latency event-related auditory evoked potentials in normal human subjects and individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Jan; 9(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 1552013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory brainstem evoked potentials peak identification by finite impulse response digital filters.
    Pratt H; Urbach D; Bleich N
    Audiology; 1989; 28(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 2803115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Simultaneous recording and separation of early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials.
    Scherg M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 6179761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of the intrasubject repeatability of auditory brain stem and middle latency responses elicited in young children.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Crews PL; McCormick VA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1988; 97(3 Pt 1):264-71. PubMed ID: 3377393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Filter effects and low stimulation rate on the middle-latency response in newborns.
    Mora JA; Expósito M; Solís C; Barajas JJ
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 2275648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of notch filtering on the waveform of the newborn auditory brainstem response.
    Lightfoot G; Ferm I; Hall A; Evans K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 24673661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A method of digital filtering to enhance the peaks of evoked potentials: application to auditory brainstem responses.
    Grandori F; Bonfioli F; Peretti G; Antonelli AR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Aug; 22(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 3167255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Digital filtering of auditory evoked potentials.
    Marsh RR
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 3044897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of low-pass filtering on the primary cortical auditory potential of the rat.
    Shaw NA
    J Neurosci Methods; 1995 Jul; 59(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 8531489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A study of methods used to enhance wave I in the auditory brain stem response.
    Ruth RA; Hildebrand DL; Cantrell RW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1982; 90(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 6819527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Meet the challenge of high-pass filter and ST-segment requirements with a DC-coupled digital electrocardiogram amplifier.
    Abächerli R; Schmid HJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 19700169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Rapid derived auditory evoked potentials].
    Conraux C; Dauman R; Feblot P
    Audiology; 1981; 20(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 7271591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. EMG artifact minimization during clinical EEG recordings by special analog filtering.
    Barlow JS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Aug; 58(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 6204843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Changes in the auditory middle latency responses during all-night sleep recording.
    Jones LA; Baxter RJ
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Nov; 22(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 3242718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Effect of cochlear processes in generating Jewett IV and V brain stem potential components].
    Janssen T; Böhnke F; Steinhoff HJ
    HNO; 1988 Dec; 36(12):511-5. PubMed ID: 3235366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Time- and intensity-dependent low-pass filtering of auditory brain stem responses.
    Hoke M; Wickesberg RE; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiology; 1984; 23(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 6721790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital zero-phase-shift filtering of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Green JB; Nelson AV; Michael D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Apr; 63(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 2419097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters.
    Robertson DG; Dowling JJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2003 Dec; 13(6):569-73. PubMed ID: 14573371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.