These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27512183)

  • 21. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.
    Campbell I
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3661-75. PubMed ID: 17315184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of mixed categorical data in 2 x K contingency tables.
    Gautam S
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1471-84. PubMed ID: 12185897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of Data that is in the Form of Categories Part II: Beyond the 2*2 Contingency Table-Partitioning Chi-Square Tests.
    Mera R; Thompson HW; Prasad C
    Nutr Neurosci; 2000; 3(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 27416372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The chi-square test: its use in rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jul; 76(7):678-81. PubMed ID: 7605189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variable selection using pair-correlation method. Environmental applications.
    Héberger K; Rajkó R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Jul; 13(5):541-54. PubMed ID: 12442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():49. PubMed ID: 26054650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation.
    Dunlap WP; Brody CJ; Greer T
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 11109997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
    Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accurate and efficient power calculations for 2 x m tables in unmatched case-control designs.
    Bukszár J; van den Oord EJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2632-46. PubMed ID: 16025555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Extended GFfit Statistic Defined on Orthogonal Components of Pearson's Chi-Square.
    Reiser M; Cagnone S; Zhu J
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):208-240. PubMed ID: 35661291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Better to be in agreement than in bad company : A critical analysis of many kappa-like tests.
    Silveira PSP; Siqueira JO
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3326-3347. PubMed ID: 36114386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(10):1081-96. PubMed ID: 9179976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exact Bayesian p-values for a test of independence in a 2 × 2 contingency table with missing data.
    Lin Y; Lipsitz SR; Sinha D; Fitzmaurice G; Lipshultz S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3411-3419. PubMed ID: 28633606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chi-square test for R x C contingency tables with clustered data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH; Ahn C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 May; 13(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 12729392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selecting a contingency table in a population-based association study: allele frequency or positivity?
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 1999; 44(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 10429364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.