215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27513333)
1. An Activity Index for Raw Accelerometry Data and Its Comparison with Other Activity Metrics.
Bai J; Di C; Xiao L; Evenson KR; LaCroix AZ; Crainiceanu CM; Buchner DM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160644. PubMed ID: 27513333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.
Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Rowlands AV; Henriksson P; Shiroma EJ; Acosta FM; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Plaza-Florido A; Gil-Cosano JJ; Ekelund U; van Hees VT; Ortega FB
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18235. PubMed ID: 31796778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Raw and Count Data Comparability of Hip-Worn ActiGraph GT3X+ and Link Accelerometers.
Montoye AHK; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Pfeiffer KA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 May; 50(5):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 29283934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapting the Intensity Gradient for Use with Count-Based Accelerometry Data in Children and Adolescents.
Alexander CJ; Manske SL; Edwards WB; Gabel L
Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?
Rowlands AV; Yates T; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 27183118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving Forward with Backward Compatibility: Translating Wrist Accelerometer Data.
Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Fairclough SJ; Boddy LM; Olds TS; Parfitt G; Noonan RJ; Downs SJ; Knowles ZR; Beets MW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Nov; 48(11):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 27327029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents.
Romanzini M; Petroski EL; Ohara D; Dourado AC; Reichert FF
Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24533499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.
Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK
J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke.
Serra MC; Balraj E; DiSanzo BL; Ivey FM; Hafer-Macko CE; Treuth MS; Ryan AS
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 27322733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist.
Rosenberger ME; Haskell WL; Albinali F; Mota S; Nawyn J; Intille S
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 May; 45(5):964-75. PubMed ID: 23247702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents.
Fairclough SJ; Rowlands AV; Del Pozo Cruz B; Crotti M; Foweather L; Graves LEF; Hurter L; Jones O; MacDonald M; McCann DA; Miller C; Noonan RJ; Owen MB; Rudd JR; Taylor SL; Tyler R; Boddy LM
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2023 Mar; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 36964597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical activity measured by accelerometry in paediatric and young adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Lund K; Larsen MD; Knudsen T; Kjeldsen J; Nielsen RG; Brage S; Nørgård BM
BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):290. PubMed ID: 35672666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Sedentary Time and Physical Activity from Hip and Non-Dominant and Dominant Wrists in Older Adults.
Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Alcantara JMA; Leal-Martín J; Mañas A; Ara I; Glynn NW; Shiroma EJ
Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34064790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization.
Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Tudor-Locke C; Löf M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Molina-Garcia P; Mora-Gonzalez J; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Garcia-Marmol E; Ekelund U; Ortega FB
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement and equivalence of estimated physical activity behaviours, using ENMO- and counts-based processing methods, for wrist-worn accelerometers in adolescents.
Williams RA; Dring KJ; Morris JG; Sun FH; Cooper SB
J Sports Sci; 2022 Nov; 40(22):2499-2508. PubMed ID: 36638058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth.
Trost SG; Brookes DSK; Ahmadi MN
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():884307. PubMed ID: 35585912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
